【24h】

Evidence-based medicine and Web 2.0: friend or foe?

机译:循证医学与Web 2.0:敌还是友?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To allow for timely translation of information into clinical practice, evidence-based medicine (EBM) requires mechanisms to retrieve all relevant available data. In addition to databases such as PubMed and other traditional online resources, the tools and technologies built around so-called user-generated content, collectively termed Web 2.0, provide for the efficient spreading and distribution of health information. Data suggest that almost 90% of physicians use Web 2.0 tools in their medical practice while few actually contribute content. About 75% of internet users including patients have looked online for health information in the past. As the easily accessible information available to the healthcare user may strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and empower patients, it may also introduce bias into the practice of EBM (Figure 1). In particular, the nature of social media and the Web 2.0 allows for a quick and completely uncontrolled environment in which information can spread whereby the provenance and trustworthiness of such sources is often not easy to determine.
机译:为了将信息及时转换为临床实践,循证医学(EBM)需要使用机制来检索所有相关的可用数据。除了诸如PubMed之类的数据库和其他传统的在线资源之外,围绕所谓的用户生成内容(统称为Web 2.0)构建的工具和技术还可以有效地传播和分发健康信息。数据表明,将近90%的医生在其医疗实践中使用Web 2.0工具,而实际上很少提供内容。过去,包括患者在内的大约75%的互联网用户在网上寻找健康信息。由于医疗保健用户可获得的易于访问的信息可以加强医患关系并增强患者的能力,因此也可能在EBM的实践中引入偏见(图1)。尤其是,社交媒体和Web 2.0的性质允许在一个快速且完全不受控制的环境中传播信息,由此通常难以确定此类来源的来源和可信赖性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号