...
首页> 外文期刊>The American psychologist >Should scientists think? Comment on Machado and Silva (2007)
【24h】

Should scientists think? Comment on Machado and Silva (2007)

机译:科学家应该思考吗?马查多和席尔瓦(2007)评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The author has previously claimed that neural activity in a medial frontal brain area represents conscious motor intentions. A. Machado and F. J. Silva (2007) attempted to challenge this claim by arguing that such intentions are not necessarily causally effective and must be caused by something else, so that they therefore cannot be the unmoved first movers in action. The author's reply is that he made no such claims about the causal status and origin of conscious intentions. In fact, he has elsewhere presented empirical evidence in support of the idea that intentions are not necessarily causal. But this does not stop researchers from studying the neural basis for the conscious impression that one intends and wills one's actions. One can feel and attend to such intentions, be they causal or not. The author's claim is that there is neural activity in the medial frontal wall that reflects such conscious feelings. Other recent empirical evidence that supports this view is described.
机译:作者先前曾声称内侧额脑区域的神经活动代表有意识的运动意图。 A. Machado和F. J. Silva(2007)试图通过质疑这样的意图来挑战这一主张,因为这些意图不一定是因果有效的,而必须是由其他原因引起的,因此它们不能成为行动不动的先动者。提交人的答复是,他没有对有意意图的因果地位和起源提出任何此类主张。实际上,他在其他地方提供了经验证据,以支持意图不一定是因果关系的观点。但这并不能阻止研究人员研究人的意图和意愿的有意识印象的神经基础。人们可以感觉到并遵守这样的意图,无论它们是否为因果关系。作者的主张是,额叶内侧前壁有神经活动,反映了这种有意识的感觉。描述了支持该观点的其他最近的经验证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号