...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Midland Naturalist >Badger (Taxidea taxus) resource selection and spatial ecology in intensive agricultural landscapes.
【24h】

Badger (Taxidea taxus) resource selection and spatial ecology in intensive agricultural landscapes.

机译:集约化农业景观中的ger(Taxidea taxus)资源选择和空间生态学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

American badgers (Taxidea taxus) are a prairie obligate species, but badger resource selection and space use is poorly understood, particularly east of the Mississippi River where anthropogenic land uses have replaced most native prairie. We assessed badger multi-scale resource selection and space use in intensive agricultural areas in Illinois and Ohio. We predicted that badgers would select for pasture and prairie, and higher elevations, and riparian areas because these habitats likely favor burrowing and foraging. Conversely, badgers should avoid cropland, roads, and forest at both spatial scales because these habitats may limit burrowing and foraging and potentially increase mortality risk. We also predicted annual male space use would increase with age and be greater than females because of age-related dominance and polygynous mating. We used radiolocations from 18 (11 females, seven males) and five (two females, three males) badgers in Illinois and Ohio, respectively, to estimate space use and multi-spatial scale resource selection. Within study areas, badgers strongly selected for cropland and higher elevations, and a lesser extent upland forest and pasture, but avoided roads and riparian areas. Landcover selection within home ranges varied by study area, but generally, badgers strongly selected for pasture, cropland, prairie, or higher elevation. Median annual 95% fixed kernel areas of Illinois badgers were greater (W8=16.00, P=0.007) for males than females, and most males appeared to overlap two to three females during the breeding season. We suggest, although our study areas were highly fragmented agricultural landscapes, badgers appeared to select land cover types similar to native prairie, which provided burrowing and foraging opportunities. However, because prairie and pasture were relatively limited, badgers used expansive (x=20.0+or-34.4 km2) home ranges to meet life requirements. Therefore, degradation and fragmentation of limiting resources may limit badger population growth in our study areas and should be considered for future management.
机译:美国badge(Taxidea taxus)是草原专用物种,但人们对badge资源的选择和空间利用知之甚少,特别是在密西西比河以东,人为的土地利用已取代了大多数本地草原。我们评估了伊利诺伊州和俄亥俄州集约化农业区的badge多尺度资源选择和空间利用。我们预测badge将选择牧场和大草原,高海拔地区和河岸地区,因为这些栖息地可能有利于穴居和觅食。相反,badge在两个空间尺度上都应避免耕地,道路和森林,因为这些栖息地可能会限制洞穴和觅食并可能增加死亡风险。我们还预测,由于年龄相关的优势和一夫多妻的交配,男性每年的空间使用量将随着年龄的增长而增加,并超过女性。我们分别使用了伊利诺伊州和俄亥俄州的18个((11名女性,7名男性)和5名(2名女性,3名男性)badge的放射定位,以估算空间使用和多空间尺度资源选择。在研究区域内,强烈选择rs作农田和高海拔地区,较少选择高地森林和牧场,但避开道路和河岸地区。家庭范围内对土地覆盖物的选择因研究区域而异,但通常,为牧场,农田,草原或更高海拔而强烈选择的badge。伊利诺伊州badge的年度固定中位数95%的中位数比雌性要大(W 8 = 16.00,P = 0.007),并且在繁殖季节,大多数雄性似乎与雌性重叠2到3个。我们建议,尽管我们的研究区域是高度分散的农业景观,但rs似乎选择了与当地大草原相似的土地覆盖类型,从而提供了掘地和觅食的机会。但是,由于草原和牧场相对有限,badge必须使用宽阔的(x = 20.0 +或-34.4 km 2 )家庭范围来满足生活需求。因此,有限资源的退化和碎片化可能会限制我们研究区域的badge种群增长,应考虑将其用于将来的管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号