首页> 外文期刊>The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics >Bargaining rationale for cooperative generic advertising
【24h】

Bargaining rationale for cooperative generic advertising

机译:合作通用广告的讨价还价依据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The beggar-thy-neighbour aspect of commodity advertising means that benefits to one commodity from advertising come at the expense of other commodities. The effect can be mitigated by cooperation among groups as shown by Alston, Freebairn and James (AFJ). A drawback to AFJ's analysis is that some cooperative outcomes require side payments from one producer group to another. This paper offers a bargaining solution as an alternative to cooperation in the case where cooperative side payments would be needed. We show that while bargaining without side payments is not as effective as cooperation at reducing beggar-thy-neighbour effects, it is a welfare improving alternative to non-cooperation and is likely more practical in many situations.
机译:商品广告的以邻为壑意味着从广告中受益于一种商品,而牺牲了其他商品。如Alston,Freebairn和James(AFJ)所示,各团体之间的合作可以减轻这种影响。 AFJ分析的一个缺点是,某些合作成果需要从一个生产者团体向另一个生产者团体支付额外费用。本文提供了一种讨价还价的解决方案,作为在需要合作方付款的情况下合作的替代方案。我们表明,虽然没有附带付款的讨价还价在减少邻里乞be方面的效果不如合作有效,但它是一种改善福利的替代非合作方式,并且在许多情况下可能更为实用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号