首页> 外文期刊>Talanta: The International Journal of Pure and Applied Analytical Chemistry >Microwave-assisted extraction and ultrasonic extraction to determine polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in needles and bark of Pinus pinaster Ait. and Pinus pinea L. by GC-MS
【24h】

Microwave-assisted extraction and ultrasonic extraction to determine polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in needles and bark of Pinus pinaster Ait. and Pinus pinea L. by GC-MS

机译:微波辅助萃取和超声萃取确定松树针叶树皮针和树皮中的多环芳烃。 GC-MS检测松树和松树

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two different extraction strategies (microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and ultrasonic extraction (USE)) were tested in the extraction of the 16 US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from pine trees. Extraction of needles and bark from two pine species common in the Iberian Peninsula (Pinus pinaster Ait. and Pinus pinea L.) was optimized using two amounts of sample (I g and 5 g) and two PAHs spiking levels (20 ng/g and 100 ng/g). In all cases, the clean-up procedure following extraction consisted in solid-phase extraction (SPE) with alumina cartridges. Quantification was done by gas chromatography (GC) with mass spectrometry (MS), using five deuterated PAH surrogate standards as internal standards. Limits of detection were globally below 0.2 ng/g. The method was robust for the matrices studied regardless of the extraction procedures. Recovery values between 70 and 130% were reached in most cases, except for high molecular weight PAHs (indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene and benzo[ghi]perylene). A field study with naturally contaminated samples from eight sites (four in Portugal and four in Catalonia, Spain) showed that needles are more suitable biomonitors for PAHs, yielding concentrations from 2 to 17 times higher than those found in bark. The levels varied according to the sampling site, with the sum of the individual PAH concentrations between 213 and 1773 ng/g (dry weight). Phenanthrene was the most abundant PAH, followed by fluoranthene, naphthalene and pyrene. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在从松树中提取16种美国环境保护局(EPA)多环芳烃(PAH)的过程中,测试了两种不同的提取策略(微波辅助提取(MAE)和超声提取(USE))。优化了伊比利亚半岛两种常见的松树(Pinus pinaster Ait。和Pinus pinea L.)的针叶和树皮的提取,使用了两种样品量(1 g和5 g)和两种PAH的加标水平(20 ng / g和5 ng)。 100 ng / g)。在所有情况下,萃取后的净化程序都包括使用氧化铝滤筒进行固相萃取(SPE)。使用五种氘代PAH替代标准品作为内标,通过气相色谱(GC)和质谱(MS)进行定量。检出限总体上低于0.2 ng / g。无论采用何种提取方法,该方法对于所研究的基质均十分可靠。除了高分子量PAH(茚并[1,2,3-cd] ,、二苯并[a,h]蒽和苯并per],大多数情况下,回收率在70%至130%之间。对来自八个地点(葡萄牙的四个地点和西班牙的加泰罗尼亚的四个地点)的自然污染样品进行的现场研究表明,针头更适合用于PAHs的生物监测,其浓度比树皮高2到17倍。含量随采样地点的不同而变化,各个PAH浓度之和在213至1773 ng / g(干重)之间。菲是最丰富的PAH,其次是荧蒽,萘和pyr。 (C)2008 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号