...
首页> 外文期刊>Urologic oncology >Mortality after major surgery for urologic cancers in specialized urology hospitals: are they any better? Konety BR, Allareddy V, Modak S, Smith B, Department of Urology, Carver College of Medicine and College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Io
【24h】

Mortality after major surgery for urologic cancers in specialized urology hospitals: are they any better? Konety BR, Allareddy V, Modak S, Smith B, Department of Urology, Carver College of Medicine and College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Io

机译:专门泌尿外科医院泌尿外科癌症大手术后的死亡率:有没有改善? Konety BR,Allareddy V,Modak S,Smith B,爱荷华大学卡佛医学院和公共卫生学院泌尿外科

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Specialty-specific hospitals and hospitals with a high volume of complex procedures have been shown to have better outcomes. We sought to determine whether a high volume of unrelated complex procedures or procedures in the same specialty area (urology) could translate into better outcomes after major urologic cancer surgery. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of administrative discharge abstract data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Health Care Utilization Project for years 1998 to 2002. Comparison of outcome after three major urologic cancer-related surgical procedures (radical cystectomy [RC], radical nephrectomy [RN], and radical prostatectomy [RP]) at hospitals by procedure-specific volume, specialized urology status, and Leapfrog criteria was obtained to determine in-hospital mortality after the procedure. All patients in the database with a diagnosis of bladder, kidney, or prostate cancer being admitted for RC, RN, or RP between 1998 and 2002 were included. RESULTS: Neither specialized urology status nor meeting Leapfrog volume criteria for unrelated procedures was associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality after any of the procedures examined. High-volume hospitals (for RC and RP) and moderate-volume hospitals (for RP) were associated with lower odds of mortality. None of the examined hospital volume-related factors was associated with lower odds of mortality after RN. CONCLUSION: In-hospital mortality after two of three major urologic cancer procedures is affected only by procedure-specific volumes. Generalized process measures existing in hospitals performing a high volume of general urologic procedures or unrelated complex procedures may be less important determinants of procedure-specific outcomes in patients.
机译:目的:已经显示出专科医院和具有大量复杂程序的医院具有更好的疗效。我们试图确定在大型泌尿外科癌症手术后,大量无关的复杂手术或同一专业领域(泌尿科)的手术是否可以转化为更好的结果。方法:我们对1998年至2002年全国医疗保健利用项目住院患者样本中的行政出院摘要数据进行了横断面分析。比较了三种主要的泌尿外科癌症相关手术方法(根治性膀胱切除术[RC],根据具体手术量,专门的泌尿科状况和Leapfrog标准,在医院中采用根治性肾切除术(RN)和根治性前列腺切除术[RP]来确定手术后的院内死亡率。数据库中所有在1998年至2002年之间被确诊为RC,RN或RP的诊断为膀胱癌,肾癌或前列腺癌的患者都包括在内。结果:无论是专门的泌尿科医师身份,还是不符合无关程序的Leapfrog量标准,均与较低的院内死亡率几率无关。高容量医院(用于RC和RP)和中容量医院(用于RP)的死亡率较低。 RN后,与检查的医院容量相关的因素均与较低的死亡率几率无关。结论:三个主要泌尿外科癌症手术中的两个手术后的院内死亡率仅受手术特定量的影响。在执行大量常规泌尿外科手术或无关的复杂手术的医院中,存在普遍的过程措施可能对决定患者具体过程结果的重要性不太重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号