...
首页> 外文期刊>Peritoneal dialysis international: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis >Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in peritoneal dialysis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
【24h】

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in peritoneal dialysis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机译:腹膜透析中的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used in clinical practice. The safety and efficacy of these agents in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are unclear. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review to study the safety and efficacy of ACEI and ARB use in PD patients. Primary outcome measures were mortality and cardiovascular (CV) events; secondary outcome measures were renal function, proteinuria, hyperkalemia, and erythropoietin requirement at 3 months. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, trial registry Web sites, reference lists of eligible and review articles, as well as abstracts from the American Society of Nephrology and Canadian Society of Nephrology meetings. To be eligible, studies had to be randomized controlled trials that allocated PD patients to ACEI and ARB use or to placebo or other antihypertensive medications, included adult patients, and reported on at least one of the outcome measures. RESULTS: 418 citations were identified. Four met the eligibility criteria. Three examined CV events and mortality, of which two studies did not have any events. The third showed no statistically significant difference between control and treatment groups in either CV events or mortality: odds ratio 1.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24 - 10.05] for mortality and odds ratio 1.00 (95% CI 0.19 - 5.40) for CV events. Two studies reported renal function at 12 months and the weighted mean difference was 0.91 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) (95% CI 0.14 - 1.68), favoring ACEI and ARB use. CONCLUSIONS: In PD patients, evidence for the use of ACEIs and ARBs for reduction of mortality and CV events is lacking. Limited data suggest that they slow the loss of residual renal function.
机译:背景:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)在临床实践中被广泛使用。这些药物在腹膜透析(PD)患者中的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。目的:我们进行了系统的审查,以研究ACEI和ARB在PD患者中的安全性和有效性。主要结果指标是死亡率和心血管事件。次要结果指标是3个月时的肾功能,蛋白尿,高钾血症和促红细胞生成素需求量。方法:我们搜索了Medline,EMBASE,Cochrane对照试验中心登记册,试验注册中心网站,合格和评论性文章的参考清单以及美国肾脏病学会和加拿大肾脏病学会会议的摘要。为使研究合格,必须进行随机对照试验,将PD患者分配到ACEI和ARB或安慰剂或其他降压药中,包括成年患者,并报告至少一项结局指标。结果:共鉴定到418条引用文献。四个符合资格标准。三项检查了心血管事件和死亡率,其中两项研究没有任何事件。第三组在对照组和治疗组之间在心血管事件或死亡率方面均无统计学差异:死亡率为1.56 [95%置信区间(CI)0.24-10.05],心血管疾病的优势比为1.00(95%CI 0.19-5.40)事件。两项研究报告了12个月时的肾功能,加权平均差为0.91 mL / min / 1.73 m(2)(95%CI 0.14-1.68),赞成使用ACEI和ARB。结论:在PD患者中,缺乏使用ACEI和ARB降低死亡率和CV事件的证据。有限的数据表明它们减慢了残余肾功能的丧失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号