首页> 外文期刊>Peritoneal dialysis international: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis >A 12-month review of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in Western Australia: is empiric vancomycin still indicated for some patients?
【24h】

A 12-month review of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in Western Australia: is empiric vancomycin still indicated for some patients?

机译:西澳大利亚州腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎的12个月回顾:仍对某些患者使用经验性万古霉素吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) guidelines recommend empiric therapy with cefazolin and ceftazidime for peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. Empiric cefazolin therapy may have diminishing efficacy because of emerging methicillin resistance in gram-positive bacteria (GPB). Western Australia also has large numbers of Aboriginal and isolated regional patients, where giving these antimicrobials can be impractical. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, based on local antimicrobial resistance patterns, the feasibility of following ISPD guidelines in Western Australia and to identify any subgroups of PD peritonitis patients that may benefit from alternative empiric intraperitoneal antibiotics (e.g., vancomycin). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of all PD peritonitis episodes in Western Australia from 1 February 2000 to 31 January 2001. SETTING: Three adult tertiary referral university hospitals and their PD patients in metropolitan Perth and regional Western Australia. PATIENTS: All adults on PD in Western Australia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Isolates and antibiograms were analyzed versus patient characteristics, including race and patient demographics. RESULTS: 293 patients (28% Aborigines, 32% regional patients) received PD. 145 episodes of PD peritonitis occurred during the study. The overall PD peritonitis rate was 1 episode/16 patient months, with Aborigines having 1 episode/10.5 patient months versus non-Aborigines having 1 episode/17 patient months (p < 0.001). 36% of isolates from PD peritonitis episodes were resistant to cefazolin or ceftazidime. 22% were methicillin-resistant GPB (MR-GPB) [18% coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), 1.6% MR Staphylococcus aureus]; 2.5% were multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB); 5.7% were polymicrobial (MR-GPB and/or MDR-GNB); and 5.7% were fungal. 63% of CoNS were methicillin resistant. Non-Aboriginal patients yielded MR-GPB in 22% of isolates versus 23% in Aborigines (p = 0.9). Six of seven cases of fungal peritonitis occurred in Aboriginal patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study population the ISPD guidelines were appropriate for 64% of patients with PD peritonitis. We could not identify specific patient subgroups where empiric cefazolin use could be more effective. High proportions of MR-GPB PD peritonitis episodes, along with local factors, make empiric cefazolin unsuitable for many regional PD patients in Western Australia.
机译:背景:国际腹膜透析协会(ISPD)指南建议使用头孢唑林和头孢他啶的经验性疗法治疗腹膜透析(PD)相关性腹膜炎。经验性头孢唑啉疗法可能会降低疗效,因为革兰氏阳性菌(GPB)中出现了对甲氧西林的耐药性。西澳大利亚州也有大量的原住民和偏远地区患者,在这些患者中使用这些抗菌药物可能不切实际。目的:根据当地的耐药性模式,评估在西澳大利亚州遵循ISPD指南的可行性,并确定可能受益于替代性经验性腹膜内抗生素(例如万古霉素)的PD腹膜炎患者的任何亚组。研究设计:2000年2月1日至2001年1月31日在西澳大利亚州所有PD腹膜炎发作的回顾性研究。地点:大都会珀斯和西澳大利亚州地区的三所成人转诊大学医院及其PD患者。患者:西澳大利亚州所有接受PD治疗的成年人。主要观察指标:根据患者特征(包括种族和患者人口统计数据)分析分离物和抗菌素谱。结果:293例患者(28%的土著居民,32%的区域性患者)接受了PD。在研究期间发生了145次PD腹膜炎。总体PD腹膜炎发生率为1次发作/ 16个患者月,其中原住民为1次发作/10.5个患者月,而非原住民则为1次发作/ 17个患者月(p <0.001)。从PD腹膜炎发作中分离出的细菌中有36%对头孢唑林或头孢他啶具有耐药性。 22%为耐甲氧西林的GPB(MR-GPB)[18%凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS),1.6%MR金黄色葡萄球菌]; 2.5%为耐多药革兰氏阴性菌(MDR-GNB); 5.7%是多微生物(MR-GPB和/或MDR-GNB);和5.7%是真菌。 63%的CoNS对甲氧西林耐药。非原住民患者中22%的分离株产生MR-GPB,而原住民中的23%(p = 0.9)。七例真菌性腹膜炎中有六例发生在原住民患者中(p <0.001)。结论:在我们的研究人群中,ISPD指南适用于64%的PD腹膜炎患者。我们无法确定使用经验性头孢唑啉可能更有效的特定患者亚组。高比例的MR-GPB PD腹膜炎发作以及局部因素使经验性头孢唑林不适合西澳大利亚州的许多区域性PD患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号