首页> 外文期刊>Peritoneal dialysis international: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis >Challenging the current treatment paradigm for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients.
【24h】

Challenging the current treatment paradigm for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients.

机译:挑战目前腹膜透析患者耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌腹膜炎的治疗方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To analyze clinical outcomes of Staphylococcus epidermidis peritoneal dialysis peritonitis before and after an interventional switch from a vancomycin/ tobramycin to a cefazolin/tobramycin regimen for empiric treatment. To examine risk factors associated with clinical failure. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: A peritoneal dialysis program within a university-affiliated tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: 93 episodes of S. epidermidis peritonitis over a 6-year period. INTERVENTIONS: Clinical responses were compared between treatments using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify significant risk factors for clinical failure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was no difference in the overall response rates observed with vancomycin (40/49; 81.6%) and cefazolin (23/29; 79.3%) regimens for episodes of S. epidermidis peritonitis. Furthermore, the presence of methicillin resistance in 63 of 93 cases (67.7%) had no influence on clinical outcome, with response rates of 83.9% (26/31) and 82.4% (14/17) for empiric vancomycin and cefazolin regimens, respectively. Tobramycin therapy of less than 2 days was an independent risk factor for clinical failure in multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 4.44, 95% confidence interval 1.28 - 15.48; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Empiric treatment with intraperitoneal cefazolin was as effective as vancomycin for S. epiderimidis peritonitis despite a high prevalence of methicillin resistance. Tobramycin therapy of less than 2 days was strongly associated with treatment failure.
机译:目的:分析表皮葡萄球菌腹膜透析腹膜炎在从万古霉素/妥布霉素改为头孢唑林/妥布霉素方案进行经验治疗的干预前后的临床结局。检查与临床失败相关的危险因素。设计:一项回顾性研究。地点:大学附属三级医院的腹膜透析计划。患者:在6年中有93次表皮葡萄球菌腹膜炎发作。干预措施:使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验比较了治疗之间的临床反应。单因素和多因素分析用于确定临床失败的重要危险因素。测量和主要结果:万古霉素(40/49; 81.6%)和头孢唑林(23/29; 79.3%)方案对表皮葡萄球菌腹膜炎发作的总体缓解率无差异。此外,在93例患者中有63例存在甲氧西林耐药性(67.7%)对临床结果没有影响,经验性万古霉素和头孢唑林方案的缓解率分别为83.9%(26/31)和82.4%(14/17)。 。在多因素logistic回归分析中,妥布霉素治疗少于2天是临床失败的独立危险因素(赔率比4.44,95%置信区间1.28-15.48; p = 0.02)。结论:尽管甲氧西林耐药率很高,但腹膜内头孢唑啉的经验性治疗与表皮葡萄球菌腹膜炎的万古霉素一样有效。少于2天的妥布霉素治疗与治疗失败密切相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号