首页> 外文期刊>Urologia internationalis >E-Learning in Urology: Implementation of the Learning and Teaching Platform CASUS (R) - Do Virtual Patients Lead to Improved Learning Outcomes? A Randomized Study among Students
【24h】

E-Learning in Urology: Implementation of the Learning and Teaching Platform CASUS (R) - Do Virtual Patients Lead to Improved Learning Outcomes? A Randomized Study among Students

机译:泌尿外科电子学习:学与教平台CASUS(R)的实施-虚拟患者能否改善学习成果?学生中的随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: E-learning is playing an increasing role in medical education, supporting a problem-based and practical oriented education without putting patients at risk and compensating for the decrease in instructor-centered teaching. Not much research has been done concerning learning effects and reaction on behalf of the students. Methods: We created computer-based cases for four important diagnoses in urology using the authoring system CASUS(R). Fourth-year medical school students were randomized into two groups: (1) the CASUS(R) group, using the online cases for preparation, and (2) the book group, using a textbook. A multiple-choice test referring to the prepared topic had to be completed at the beginning of each lecture and the results were analyzed. Evaluation of the students concerning the acceptance of the program was done at the end of the semester. Results: Members of the CASUS(R) group scored significantly higher with an average of 20% better test results than students using textbooks for preparation. Evaluation regarding the program showed a highly positive rating. Limitations include the small study population and the possibly biased test performance of the students. Conclusion: Computerized patient cases facilitate practice-oriented teaching and result in an interesting and engaging learning model with improved learning outcomes. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:电子学习在医学教育中发挥着越来越重要的作用,它支持以问题为基础,以实践为导向的教育,而不会给患者带来风险,并能补偿以讲师为中心的教学的减少。关于代表学生的学习效果和反应的研究还很少。方法:我们使用创作系统CASUS(R)为泌尿外科的四个重要诊断创建了基于计算机的病例。四年制医学院的学生被随机分为两组:(1)CASUS(R)组,使用在线案例作准备;(2)书本组,使用教科书。在每次授课开始时必须完成针对准备好的主题的多项选择测试,并对结果进行分析。在学期末对学生对该课程的接受程度进行评估。结果:与使用教科书进行准备的学生相比,CASUS(R)组的成员的得分明显更高,平均测试结果要好20%。关于该计划的评估显示出很高的评价。局限性包括学习人数少和学生的考试成绩可能存在偏差。结论:计算机化的患者案例有助于以实践为导向的教学,并产生了一种有趣且引人入胜的学习模型,并改善了学习效果。 (C)2015 S.Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号