...
首页> 外文期刊>Systems and Control Letters >Maximal versus strong solution to algebraic Riccati equations arising in infinite Markov jump linear systems
【24h】

Maximal versus strong solution to algebraic Riccati equations arising in infinite Markov jump linear systems

机译:无限马尔可夫跳跃线性系统中代数Riccati方程的最大解与强解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We deal with a perturbed algebraic Riccati equation in an infinite dimensional Banach space which appears, for instance, in the optimal control problem for infinite Markov jump linear systems (from now on iMJLS). Infinite or finite here has to do with the state space of the Markov chain being infinite countable or finite (see, e.g., [M.D. Fragoso, J. Baczynski, Optimal control for continuous time LQ-problems with infinite Markov jump parameters, SIAM J. Control Optim. 40(1) (2001) 270-297]). By using a certain concept of stochastic stability (a sort of L-2-stability), we have proved in [J. Baczynski, M.D. Fragoso, Maximal solution to algebraic Riccati equations linked to infinite Markov jump linear systems, Internal Report LNCC, no. 6, 2006] existence (and uniqueness) of maximal solution for this class of equations. As it is noticed in this paper, unlike the finite case (including the linear case), we cannot guarantee anymore that maximal solution is a strong solution in this setting. Via a discussion on the main mathematical hindrance behind this issue, we devise some mild conditions for this implication to hold. Specifically, our main result here is that, under stochastic stability, along with a condition related with convergence in the infinite dimensional scenario, and another one related to spectrum-weaker than spectral continuity-we ensure the maximal solution to be also a strong solution. These conditions hold trivially in the finite case, allowing us to recover the result of strong solution of [C.E. de Souza, M.D. Fragoso, On the existence of maximal solution for generalized algebraic Riccati equations arising in stochastic control, Systems Control Lett. 14 (1990) 233-239] set for MJLS. The issue of whether the convergence condition is restrictive or not is brought to light and, together with some counterexamples, unveil further differences between the finite and the infinite countable case. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们处理无限维Banach空间中的摄动代数Riccati方程,例如,出现在无限Markov跳跃线性系统的最优控制问题中(从现在开始,出现在iMJLS上)。此处的无限或有限与马尔可夫链的状态空间是无限可数或有限有关的(例如,参见[MD Fragoso,J. Baczynski,具有无限马尔可夫跳跃参数的连续时间LQ问题的最优控制,SIAMJ。 Control Optim。40(1)(2001)270-297])。通过使用某种随机稳定性的概念(一种L-2-稳定性),我们在[J. Baczynski,M.D. Fragoso,与无限马氏跳线性系统相关的代数Riccati方程的最大解,内部报告LNCC,no。 (2006年6月6日)此类方程的最大解的存在(和唯一性)。正如本文所注意到的,与有限情况(包括线性情况)不同,我们不能再保证最大解在这种情况下是一个强解。通过对这个问题背后的主要数学障碍的讨论,我们为保持这种涵义设计了一些温和的条件。具体来说,我们的主要结果是,在随机稳定性的情况下,伴随着无限维情形下的收敛性,以及与频谱弱于频谱连续性有关的另一种情况,我们确保最大解也是强解。这些条件在有限情况下微不足道,使我们能够恢复[C.E. de Souza,M.D. Fragoso,关于随机控制中出现的广义代数Riccati方程的最大解的存在,《系统控制函》。 14(1990)233-239]设置为MJLS。揭示了收敛条件是否具有限制性的问题,并与一些反例一起揭示了有限和无限可数情况之间的进一步差异。 (C)2007 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号