首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma.
【24h】

Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma.

机译:保留肾单位的手术后切除切缘宽度对肾细胞癌的预后重要性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between the width of the resection margin and disease progression in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). During NSS for RCC, it is standard practice to excise the tumor along with a surrounding margin of normal parenchyma (margin of resection) to ensure complete resection of the neoplasm. However, no agreement has been reached on how wide the margin of resection should be. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the histopathologic sections and medical records of 69 patients with localized RCC who had undergone NSS between 1976 and 1988 to determine whether the resection margin, tumor size, TNM stage, and Fuhrman nuclear grade were associated with disease progression (defined as local tumor recurrence or metastasis). The mean postoperative follow-up interval was 8.5 years. RESULTS: No association was found between the width of the resection margin and disease progression (P = 0.98, log-rank test). Both TNM stage and Fuhrman nuclear grade correlated with disease progression. Patients with T1-T2 tumors had lower progression (P <0.001, log-rank test), and increased Fuhrman nuclear grade correlated with more disease progression (P <0.001, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The width of the resection margin after NSS for RCC does not correlate with long-term disease progression. A histologic tumor-free margin of resection, irrespective of the width of the margin is sufficient to achieve complete local excision of RCC.
机译:目的:探讨保留肾单位(NSS)的肾细胞癌(RCC)的切除边缘宽度与疾病进展之间的关系。在用于RCC的NSS期间,通常的做法是切除肿瘤以及正常薄壁组织的周围边缘(切除范围),以确保完全切除肿瘤。但是,在切除范围应达到多大方面尚未达成共识。方法:我们回顾性研究了1976年至1988年间接受NSS的69例局部RCC患者的组织病理学切片和病历,以确定切除范围,肿瘤大小,TNM分期和Fuhrman核级是否与疾病进展相关(定义为局部肿瘤复发或转移)。术后平均随访时间为8.5年。结果:切除边缘的宽度与疾病进展之间没有关联(P = 0.98,对数秩检验)。 TNM分期和Fuhrman核级均与疾病进展相关。 T1-T2肿瘤患者的病程进展较低(P <0.001,对数检验),Fuhrman核级升高与疾病进展更多相关(P <0.001,对数检验)。结论:NSC后RCC的切除切缘宽度与长期疾病进展无关。切除组织学无肿瘤的切缘,无论切缘的宽度如何都足以实现RCC的完全局部切除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号