...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
【24h】

Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.

机译:耻骨后耻骨根治术和会阴前列腺根治术的费用比较:单一机构的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To perform a detailed comparison of the in-house hospital costs of patients undergoing radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) performed with or without bilateral staging lymph node dissection (BPLND) for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cost review was done of a cohort of 402 consecutive radical prostatectomies performed at our institution during a 21-month period. The procedure was performed as RPP in 279 (69.4%) and RRP in 123 (30.6%) patients, of whom 10.4% and 61.8%, respectively, underwent BPLND under the same anesthesia. The hospital costs were evaluated for each patient using the categories of surgical, nursing, laboratory/transfusion, and pharmacy. Surgical costs were further subdivided into operating room, anesthesia, and recovery room costs. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were applied to identify predictors of procedure-related costs. RESULTS: The median hospital costs of patients undergoing RPP (7195 dollars, range 5052 dollars to 36,237 dollars) were substantially lower than those of patients undergoing RRP (9757 dollars, range 6935 dollars to 27,771 dollars; P = 0.001). The median costs for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy without BPLND were significantly lower in the RPP (7100 dollars, range 5052 dollars to 28,604 dollars) versus RRP (9169 dollars, range 6935 dollars to 16,705 dollars) patients (P = 0.001). The costs for RPP with BPLND (10,048 dollars, range 7529 dollars to 36,237 dollars) versus RRP with BPLND (9973 dollars, range 7658 dollars to 27,771 dollars) were not significantly different (P = 0.900). Patient age and nerve-preservation status did not significantly influence the procedure-related hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: RPP may result in lower in-house costs per patient than RRP in those patients who do not require BPLND. Total hospital costs depend largely on the factors of operating room time, length of stay, and laboratory and transfusion requirements, which may vary among institutions.
机译:目的:对进行局部或局部双侧淋巴结清扫术(BPLND)或不进行双侧淋巴结清扫术的患者进行内部会阴会阴前列腺切除术(RPP)和根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术(RRP)的内部医院费用的详细比较。方法:回顾性分析了21个月期间在我们机构进行的402例连续根治性前列腺切除术的队列研究。该手术以279例(69.4%)的RPP和123例(30.6%)的RRP进行,其中在相同麻醉下分别接受BPLND的患者分别为10.4%和61.8%。使用手术,护理,实验室/输血和药房类别对每位患者的医院费用进行评估。手术费用进一步细分为手术室,麻醉和恢复室费用。应用单变量和多变量统计分析来确定与程序相关的成本的预测因素。结果:接受RPP的患者的中位住院费用(7195美元,范围5052至36,237美元)显着低于接受RRP的患者(9757美元,范围6935美元至27,771美元; P = 0.001)。与RRP患者(9169美元,范围6935美元至16705美元)相比,RPP患者(7100美元,范围5052美元至28604美元)进行根治性前列腺切除术而没有BPLND的患者的中位费用明显降低(P = 0.001)。带有BPLND的RPP(10,048美元,范围7529美元至36,237美元)与带有BPLND的RRP(9973美元,范围7658美元至27,771美元)的成本没有显着差异(P = 0.900)。患者的年龄和神经保存状态对手术相关的医院费用没有显着影响。结论:与不需要BPLND的患者相比,RPP可能导致每位患者的内部成本低于RRP。医院的总费用在很大程度上取决于手术室时间,住院时间,实验室和输血要求等因素,各机构之间可能会有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号