首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Rapamycin preserves renal function compared with cyclosporine A after ischemia/reperfusion injury.
【24h】

Rapamycin preserves renal function compared with cyclosporine A after ischemia/reperfusion injury.

机译:与环孢素A相比,雷帕霉素在缺血/再灌注损伤后可保留肾脏功能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of cyclosporine and rapamycin administration on renal function after ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/R). Cyclosporine A has known nephrotoxic effects. Thus, cyclosporine therapy subsequent to I/R injury may further exacerbate graft dysfunction. Rapamycin is a newer agent that suppresses the immune system by a different mechanism. METHODS: Male Wistar rats (250 g) were anesthetized, and the suprarenal aorta was clamped for 40 minutes. The right kidney was removed. After recovery, the rats were divided into four groups: group 1, controls, no ischemia and no treatment (n = 10); group 2, ischemia with no treatment (n = 8); group 3, ischemia plus rapamycin (0.17 mg/kg/day gavage, n = 8); and group 4, ischemia plus cyclosporine A (30 mg/kg/day intraperitoneally, n = 9). The glomerular filtration rate was measured 5 to 7 days after I/R injury using urinary iohexol clearance. Data are expressed as the mean +/- SEM, and intergroup comparisons were made using one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean GFR value for the controls (no ischemia, no treatment) was 1.23 +/- 0.08 mL/min; for group 2 (ischemia, no treatment), it was 1.05 +/- 0.10 mL/min; for group 3 (ischemia plus rapamycin) 1.06 +/- 0.14 mL/min; and for group 4 (ischemia plus cyclosporine A) 0.44 +/- 0.06 mL/min (P <0.05 versus the other three groups). The mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in the ischemic rats treated with cyclosporine A (P <0.05 versus the other three groups). CONCLUSIONS: After I/R injury, rapamycin may preserve renal function compared with cyclosporine treatment, because it does not have a direct vasoconstrictor effect on the renal microcirculation.
机译:目的:确定环孢素和雷帕霉素给药对缺血/再灌注损伤(I / R)后肾功能的影响。环孢菌素A具有已知的肾毒性作用。因此,I / R损伤后的环孢素治疗可能会进一步加剧移植物功能障碍。雷帕霉素是一种通过不同机制抑制免疫系统的新型药物。方法:麻醉雄性Wistar大鼠(250 g),将肾上主动脉夹住40分钟。右肾摘除。恢复后,将大鼠分为四组:第1组,对照组,无缺血,无治疗(n = 10);第1组为对照组。第2组,未经治疗的局部缺血(n = 8);第3组,缺血加雷帕霉素(0.17 mg / kg /日灌胃,n = 8);第4组,缺血再加环孢素A(腹膜内30 mg / kg /天,n = 9)。 I / R损伤后5至7天使用尿碘海醇清除率测量肾小球滤过率。数据表示为平均值+/- SEM,使用单向方差分析进行组间比较。结果:对照组(无缺血,无治疗)的平均GFR值为1.23 +/- 0.08 mL / min。第2组(缺血,未治疗)为1.05 +/- 0.10 mL / min;对于第3组(缺血加雷帕霉素)1.06 +/- 0.14 mL / min;对于第4组(缺血加环孢霉素A)为0.44 +/- 0.06 mL / min(与其他三组相比,P <0.05)。在用环孢霉素A治疗的缺血大鼠中,平均动脉压明显较低(与其他三组相比,P <0.05)。结论:I / R损伤后,雷帕霉素与环孢素治疗相比可以保留肾脏功能,因为它对肾脏微循环没有直接的血管收缩作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号