...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Da vinci skills simulator for assessing learning curve and criterion-based training of robotic basic skills
【24h】

Da vinci skills simulator for assessing learning curve and criterion-based training of robotic basic skills

机译:达芬奇技能模拟器,用于评估学习曲线和基于标准的机器人基本技能培训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To answer 2 research questions: what are the learning curve patterns of novices on the da Vinci skills simulator parameters and what parameters are appropriate for criterion-based robotic training. Materials and Methods: A total of 17 novices completed 2 simulator sessions within 3 days. Each training session consisted of a warming-up exercise, followed by 5 repetitions of the "ring and rail II" task. Expert participants (n = 3) performed a warming-up exercise and 3 repetitions of the "ring and rail II" task on 1 day. We analyzed all 9 parameters of the simulator. Results: Significant learning occurred on 5 parameters: overall score, time to complete, instrument collision, instruments out of view, and critical errors within 1-10 repetitions (P <.05). Economy of motion and excessive instrument force only showed improvement within the first 5 repetitions. No significant learning on the parameter drops and master workspace range was found. Using the expert overall performance score (n = 3) as a criterion (overall score 90%), 9 of 17 novice participants met the criterion within 10 repetitions. Conclusion: Most parameters showed that basic robotic skills are learned relatively quickly using the da Vinci skills simulator, but that 10 repetitions were not sufficient for most novices to reach an expert level. Some parameters seemed inappropriate for expert-based criterion training because either no learning occurred or the novice performance was equal to expert performance. ? 2013 Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
机译:目的:回答两个研究问题:达芬奇技能模拟器参数的新手学习曲线模式是什么,以及哪些参数适合基于标准的机器人训练。资料和方法:总共17个新手在3天内完成了2个模拟器课程。每次培训均包括热身练习,然后重复5次“环和铁轨II”任务。专家参与者(n = 3)在1天内进行了一次热身运动和3次“ ring and rail II”任务的重复。我们分析了模拟器的所有9个参数。结果:在5个参数上进行了重要的学习:总体得分,完成时间,仪器碰撞,仪器视线以及1-10次重复内的严重错误(P <.05)。运动经济性和过大的器械力量仅在前5次重复中显示出改善。没有发现关于参数下降和主工作区范围的大量学习。以专家的总体表现得分(n = 3)为标准(总分90%),在10次重复中17名新手参与者中有9名达到了标准。结论:大多数参数表明,使用达芬奇技能模拟器可以较快地学习基本的机器人技能,但是10次重复不足以使大多数新手达到专家水平。一些参数似乎不适合基于专家的标准培训,因为要么没有学习发生,要么新手表现等于专家表现。 ? 2013 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号