首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Nephrostomy Tube Placement After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Critical Evaluation Through a Prospective Randomized Study
【24h】

Nephrostomy Tube Placement After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Critical Evaluation Through a Prospective Randomized Study

机译:经皮肾镜取石术后肾造口术管的位置:通过一项前瞻性随机研究的关键评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the hemostatic and drainage functions of the nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy through a prospective randomized study. Additionally, the effect of nephros-tomy tube placement on postoperative pain, hospital stay, and the success and complication rates was assessed.METHODS:The present study was designed to include 100 patients with upper urinary tract calculi who were prospectively randomized to tubeless (group 1) and standard (group 2) PCNL using closed envelopes. The hemoglobin and hematocrit deficits, development of hematuria and hematoma, and blood transfusion rate were compared to assess the hemostatic effect. The drainage effect was evaluated by comparing the incidence of postoperative urinary leakage, urinoma, and/or hydro-thorax development.RESULTS:A total of 123 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 100 fulfilled the study requirements. The hemoglobin and hematocrit deficits were comparable. Significant hematuria and/or hematoma were recorded in 5 and 4 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Blood transfusion was required in 5 and 6 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. One patient with chronic kidney disease in the tubeless group required abdominal exploration because of respiratory embarrassment and a large hematoma. Transient urinary leakage was recorded in 2 and 31 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < .05). No urinoma developed. Hemothorax developed in 1 patient in the tubeless group with supracostal puncture. Postoperative pain was significantly less in the tubeless group. No statistically significant difference was found in the success rate, morbidity, or hospital stay between the 2 groups.CONCLUSION:The hemostatic and drainage functions of the nephrostomy tube were modest. However, the tubeless approach might be not suitable for the patients with chronic kidney disease or a supracostal approach.
机译:目的:通过一项前瞻性随机研究评估经皮肾镜取石术后肾造口术管的止血和引流功能。此外,评估了肾结石切开管的放置对术后疼痛,住院时间以及成功率和并发症发生率的影响。方法:本研究旨在包括100例前尿路结石患者,这些患者前瞻性随机分为无管患者(组1)和使用封闭信封的标准(第2组)PCNL。比较血红蛋白和血细胞比容不足,血尿和血肿的发展以及输血率,以评估止血效果。通过比较术后尿漏,尿液瘤和/或胸膜积水的发生率来评估引流效果。结果:总共对123例患者进行了资格评估,其中100例符合研究要求。血红蛋白和血细胞比容不足是可比的。在第1组和第2组中分别有5例和4例患者出现明显的血尿和/或血肿。第1组和第2组的5例和6例分别需要输血。无呼吸组的一名慢性肾脏病患者由于呼吸窘迫和较大的血肿而需要腹部探查。在第1组和第2组中分别记录了2例和31例患者的短暂尿液渗漏(P <.05)。无尿路瘤形成。胸上穿刺的无管组1例患者出现了胸腔积液。无管组术后疼痛明显减轻。两组的成功率,发病率或住院时间均无统计学差异。结论:肾造瘘管的止血和引流功能中等。但是,无管入路可能不适合患有慢性肾脏疾病或肋上入路的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号