首页> 外文期刊>Urban Forestry & Urban Greening >Evaluating the life cycle net benefit of low impact development in a city
【24h】

Evaluating the life cycle net benefit of low impact development in a city

机译:评估城市低影响力开发的生命周期净收益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Low impact development (LID) practices (e.g., green roofs, bioretention systems, and porous pavements) offer multiple benefits to urban eco-systems. They reduce the expenses associated with water treatment, grey infrastructure, and energy consumption and thus generate economic benefits. They also benefit the environment by mitigating air pollution and climate change, and they provide social benefits such as enhancing livability, urban green space, and educating and improving the health of the public. Many studies have attempted to calculate the monetary value of these benefits. However, few have considered all three types of benefits (i.e., economic, environmental, and social) or considered all of the different LID practices at a city-scale. This study develops a life cycle quantification framework to determine the monetary values of the three types of benefits and the life cycle net benefit of LID practices for a city. Applying the proposed framework to a case study of Hong Kong, the 30-year economic and environmental benefits are 5.3 billion USD and 1.2 billion USD, respectively. The mean and median social benefits are 35.1 billion USD and 49.6 billion USD, respectively. Subtracting the 30-year LID implementation cost (55.8 billion USD) produces a median positive net benefit of 2.3 billion USD with an annual unit value of 1.05 USD/m(2) yr, and a mean negative net benefit of 12.2 billion USD with an annual unit value of 5.58 USD/m(2) yr. Sensitivity analyses show that the net benefit is sensitive to the willingness to pay (WTP) of Hong Kong people, especially the WTP of the private sector, and the land cost of green roofs. Overall, this study provides a framework for quantifying and evaluating the life cycle cost, benefits, and net benefit of LID practices. The assumptions in the framework can be modified based on local information and applied to many other cities worldwide. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
机译:低影响开发(LID)做法(例如,屋顶绿化,生物保留系统和多孔人行道)为城市生态系统带来了多项好处。它们减少了与水处理,灰色基础设施和能源消耗相关的费用,从而产生了经济效益。它们还通过减轻空气污染和气候变化而使环境受益,并提供了诸如提高宜居性,城市绿色空间以及教育和改善公众健康等社会效益。许多研究试图计算这些收益的货币价值。但是,很少有人考虑过所有三种类型的收益(即经济,环境和社会收益),也没有考虑过城市规模上所有不同的LID做法。这项研究建立了一个生命周期量化框架,以确定城市的三种形式的收益的货币价值以及LID做法的生命周期净收益。将拟议的框架应用于香港的案例研究,其30年的经济和环境效益分别为53亿美元和12亿美元。平均和中位数社会收益分别为351亿美元和496亿美元。减去30年的LID实施成本(558亿美元),产生的正净收益中值为23亿美元,年单位价值为1.05 USD / m(2)年,平均净负收益为122亿美元,其中年单位价值为5.58 USD / m(2)年。敏感性分析显示,净收益​​对香港人的支付意愿(特别是私营部门的支付意愿)以及绿色屋顶的土地成本敏感。总体而言,本研究提供了一个框架,用于量化和评估LID实践的生命周期成本,收益和净收益。可以根据本地信息修改框架中的假设,并将其应用于全球其他许多城市。 (C)2016 Elsevier GmbH。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号