首页> 外文期刊>Psychotherapy and psychosomatics >Psychological stress and neuroendocrine function in humans: the last two decades of research.
【24h】

Psychological stress and neuroendocrine function in humans: the last two decades of research.

机译:人类的心理压力和神经内分泌功能:最近二十年的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper reviews experimental contributions published in the last two decades and exploring the effect of emotional stress on neuroendocrine function in healthy humans. Laboratory studies allow standardization of the stressor and better control for known confounding factors. Commonly used stressors are mental arithmetics, speech tasks, the Stroop test, videogame playing, films or videotapes and interviews. Little is known about the generalizability of laboratory results, with some studies suggesting great caution in extrapolating data to real-life stress conditions. Another strategy is studying the psychoendocrine reaction to real-life stressors, such as bereavement or anticipated loss, academic examinations, everyday work and parachute jumping. The effects of different stressors on neuroendocrine axes are reviewed, as well as the influence of gender, age, personality, coping style, social support, biological and nonbiological interventions. The subjective perception of the situation is probably a main determinant of the psychoendocrine response pattern. In fact, marked variability in individual responses to a variety of stressors has frequently been observed. Evidently, the 'objective' characteristics of a given event are not the only determinants of reaction to the event itself. According to a constructivistic perspective, every given stressor has a strictly personal and idiosyncratic meaning and loses its 'objective' characteristics. Of course, biological factors may also play a part. In any case, it is mandatory to overcome a rigid dichotomy between psychological and biological processes. Dualistic conceptions which imply a determination of the physical by the psychological or vice versa should give place to a systemic conception, which implies mutual, circular interactions.
机译:本文回顾了过去二十年来发表的实验性贡献,并探讨了情绪压力对健康人的神经内分泌功能的影响。实验室研究可以使压力源标准化并更好地控制已知的混杂因素。常用的压力源包括心算,语音任务,Stroop测试,视频游戏,电影或录像带和访谈。对实验室结果的一般性了解甚少,一些研究表明在将数据外推到现实生活中的压力条件时要格外谨慎。另一种策略是研究对现实生活压力源的心理内分泌反应,例如丧亲或预期损失,学术考试,日常工作和跳伞。审查了不同压力源对神经内分泌轴的影响,以及性别,年龄,个性,应对方式,社会支持,生物学和非生物学干预的影响。对情况的主观感知可能是心理内分泌反应模式的主要决定因素。实际上,人们经常观察到对各种压力源的个体反应存在明显的变异性。显然,给定事件的“客观”特征并不是对事件本身反应的唯一决定因素。根据建构主义的观点,每个给定的压力源都具有严格的个人和特质含义,并失去其“客观”特征。当然,生物学因素也可能起作用。无论如何,必须克服心理和生物学过程之间的僵化二分法。意味着通过心理学或反之亦然来确定身体的二元论概念应置于系统的概念之上,后者意味着相互的,循环的相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号