...
首页> 外文期刊>Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the Psychological Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer >The validity of the family relationships index as a screening tool for psychological risk in families of cancer patients.
【24h】

The validity of the family relationships index as a screening tool for psychological risk in families of cancer patients.

机译:家庭关系指数作为癌症患者家庭心理风险筛查工具的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Family Relationships Inventory (FRI) has been proposed as a measure of psychological risk however its validity has only been tested in one cross-sectional study against another measure of family functioning where patients had less than six months to live. The current study presented longitudinal data on the validity of the FRI in identifying family dysfunction, and clinical levels of depression and anxiety in 48 families where the patient had been recently diagnosed. Over the three phases, the FRI identified all families at risk of family dysfunction, 88% or more families with one or more members with clinical depression and 78% or more with a member with clinical levels of anxiety. The FRI was also far more sensitive in identifying families with a member with clinical levels of depression and anxiety than the General Functioning (FAD-GF) scale of the Family Assessment Device. Although other measures of screening adequacy (such as specificity), suggested that the FRI identified too many false positives, the higher sensitivity of the FRI makes it preferable to the FAD-GF as a screening measure for families at risk of a poor psychological outcome in the oncology setting. However, because of the FRI's poor specificity, further follow-up of those families that are identified as being at some risk of a poor psychological outcome should be undertaken before referral to a mental health professional is warranted.
机译:已经提出了家庭关系量表(FRI)作为心理风险的量度,但是它的有效性仅在一项横断面研究中相对于患者生存时间少于六个月的另一项家庭功能量度进行了检验。当前的研究提供了有关FRI识别家庭功能障碍的有效性的纵向数据,以及最近诊断出该患者的48个家庭的抑郁和焦虑的临床水平。在这三个阶段中,FRI确定了所有有家庭功能障碍风险的家庭,88%或更多的家庭有一个或多个成员患有临床抑郁症,78%或更多的家庭具有一个临床焦虑水平。与家庭评估装置的通用功能(FAD-GF)量表相比,FRI在识别患有抑郁症和焦虑症临床症状的家庭时也要敏感得多。尽管其他筛查充分性的方法(例如特异性)表明FRI识别出了太多的假阳性,但FRI的较高敏感性使其比FAD-GF更可取,可作为筛查处于心理状况不良风险中的家庭的筛查方法。肿瘤学设置。但是,由于FRI的特异性较差,应在确定需要转诊至精神卫生专业人员之前,对那些被认为有一定心理后果风险的家庭进行进一步随访。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号