...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological assessment >Defining distinct negative beliefs about uncertainty: validating the factor structure of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale.
【24h】

Defining distinct negative beliefs about uncertainty: validating the factor structure of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale.

机译:定义关于不确定性的不同否定信念:验证不确定性量表的不容忍度的因素结构。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examined the factor structure of the English version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS; French version: M. H. Freeston, J. Rheaume, H. Letarte, M. J. Dugas, & R. Ladouceur, 1994; English version: K. Buhr & M. J. Dugas, 2002) using a substantially larger sample than has been used in previous studies. Nonclinical undergraduate students and adults from the community (M age = 23.74 years, SD = 6.36; 73.0% female and 27.0% male) who participated in 16 studies in the Anxiety Disorders Laboratory at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada were randomly assigned to 2 datasets. Exploratory factor analysis with the 1st sample (n = 1,230) identified 2 factors: the beliefs that "uncertainty has negative behavioral and self-referent implications" and that "uncertainty is unfair and spoils everything." This 2-factor structure provided a good fit to the data (Bentler-Bonett normed fit index = .96, comparative fit index = .97, standardized root-mean residual = .05, root-mean-square error of approximation = .07) upon confirmatory factor analysis with the 2nd sample (n = 1,221). Both factors showed similarly high correlations with pathological worry, and Factor 1 showed stronger correlations with generalized anxiety disorder analogue status, trait anxiety, somatic anxiety, and depressive symptomatology.
机译:这项研究检查了不确定性量表的英语版本(IUS;法语版本:MH Freeston,J。Rheaume,H。Letarte,MJ Dugas和R.Ladouceur,1994年;英语版本:K。Buhr& MJ Dugas,2002年)使用的样本比以前的研究大得多。在加拿大蒙特利尔康科迪亚大学焦虑症实验室参加了16项研究的非临床本科生和社区成年人(M年龄= 23.74岁,SD = 6.36;女性73.0%,男性27.0%)被随机分配至2个数据集。用第一个样本(n = 1,230)进行的探索性因素分析确定了两个因素:“不确定性具有负面的行为和自我指称含义”和“不确定性不公平并且破坏了一切”的信念。这种2因子结构很好地拟合了数据(Bentler-Bonett规范拟合指数= .96,比较拟合指数= .97,标准化均方根残差= .05,均方根近似误差= .07 ),然后使用第二个样本(n = 1,221)进行确认性因子分析。两种因素与病理性焦虑的相关性相似,而因子1与广义焦虑症的类似状态,特质性焦虑,躯体性焦虑和抑郁症状相关性更强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号