首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >Are Representations in Working Memory Distinct from Representations in Long-Term Memory? Neural Evidence in Support of a Single Store
【24h】

Are Representations in Working Memory Distinct from Representations in Long-Term Memory? Neural Evidence in Support of a Single Store

机译:工作记忆中的表示形式是否与长期记忆中的表示形式不同?支持单一商店的神经证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Neural activation in a 12-item probe-recognition task was examined to investigate the contribution of the hippocampus to long-term memory (LTM) retrieval and working memory (WM) retrieval. Results indicated a dissociation between the last item that participants studied and other items of the study list: Compared with all other serial positions, activation was reduced for the item in the most recent position (for which no items intervened between study and test). This finding suggests that this last item was in focal attention at test time, and, therefore, no retrieval operation was required to access it. However, contra the assertion that the hippocampus should selectively support LTM, activation of the medial temporal lobe was observed for all serial positions other than the last position, and activation level could be predicted from the underlying memory strength. Collectively, these findings support single-store accounts that assume there are similar operating principles across WM and LTM representations, and the focus of attention is limited.
机译:研究了12个项的探针识别任务中的神经激活,以研究海马对长期记忆(LTM)检索和工作记忆(WM)检索的贡献。结果表明参与者学习的最后一个项目与研究列表的其他项目之间没有关联:与所有其他连续位置相比,最近位置的项目的激活减少(为此,在研究和测试之间没有任何项目干预)。这一发现表明,最后一项在测试时受到了关注,因此,不需要检索操作即可访问它。但是,与海马应该选择性支持LTM的说法相反,对于除最后一个位置以外的所有连续位置,观察到内侧颞叶的激活,并且可以从潜在的记忆力中预测激活水平。总的来说,这些发现支持单商店帐户,这些帐户假定WM和LTM表示形式具有相似的操作原理,并且关注的重点是有限的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号