首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >The Unthinking or Confident Extremist? Political Extremists Are More Likely Than Moderates to Reject Experimenter-Generated Anchors
【24h】

The Unthinking or Confident Extremist? Political Extremists Are More Likely Than Moderates to Reject Experimenter-Generated Anchors

机译:毫无思想或自信的极端主义者?政治极端主义者比中庸主义者更容易拒绝实验者产生的锚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

People with extreme political opinions are alternatively characterized as being relatively unthinking or as confident consumers and practitioners of politics. In three studies, we tested these competing hypotheses using cognitive anchoring tasks (total N = 6,767). Using two different measures of political extremity, we found that extremists were less influenced than political moderates by two types of experimenter-generated anchors (Studies 1-3) and that this result was mediated by extremists' belief superiority (Study 2). Extremists and moderates, however, were not differentially influenced by self-generated anchors (Study 2), which suggests that extremists differentiated between externally and internally generated anchors. These results are consistent with the confident-extremist perspective and contradict the unthinking-extremist perspective. The present studies demonstrate the utility of adopting a basic cognitive task to investigate the relationship between ideology and cognitive style and suggest that extremity does not necessarily beget irrationality.
机译:具有极端政治见解的人也可以被认为是相对缺乏思想或对政治的拥护者和信徒。在三项研究中,我们使用认知锚定任务(总N = 6,767)测试了这些竞争假设。使用两种不同的政治极端手段,我们发现极端主义者受政治活动者的影响要小于两种类型的实验者产​​生的锚点(研究1-3),并且这一结果是由极端主义者的信仰优势所调节的(研究2)。然而,极端主义者和温和派不受自我产生的锚的差异影响(研究2),这表明极端主义者在外部产生的锚和内部产生的锚之间有所区别。这些结果与自信极端主义者的观点是一致的,与未思考极端主义者的观点相矛盾。本研究表明采取基本的认知任务来调查意识形态与认知风格之间的关系的实用性,并表明四肢不一定会变得非理性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号