首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >Explaining contradictory relations between risk perception and risk taking
【24h】

Explaining contradictory relations between risk perception and risk taking

机译:解释风险感知与冒险之间的矛盾关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Different studies have documented opposite relations between perceived risk and behavior. The present study tested a theoretical explanation that reconciles these conflicting results. Adolescents (N = 596) completed alternative measures of risk perception that differed in cue specificity and response format. As predicted by fuzzy-trace theory, measures that emphasized verbatim retrieval and quantitative processing produced positive correlations between perceived risk and risky behavior; risk perceptions reflected the extent to which adolescents engaged in risky behavior. In contrast, measures that assessed global, gist-based judgments of risk produced negative correlations; higher risk perceptions were associated with less risk taking, a protective rather than reflective relation. Endorsement of simple values and principles provided the greatest protection against risk taking. Results support a dual-processes interpretation of the relation between risk perception and risk taking according to which observed relations depend on whether the cues in questions trigger verbatim or gist processing.
机译:不同的研究记录了感知到的风险与行为之间的相反关系。本研究测试了调和这些矛盾结果的理论解释。青少年(N = 596)完成了风险感知的替代度量,这些度量在提示特异性和响应格式上有所不同。正如模糊痕迹理论所预测的那样,强调逐字检索和定量处理的措施在感知到的风险和风险行为之间产生了正相关。风险意识反映了青少年从事风险行为的程度。相比之下,评估基于风险的整体判断的措施则产生了负相关。较高的风险意识与较少承担风险有关,这是保护性关系而不是反思性关系。认可简单的价值观和原则为防范冒险提供了最大的保护。结果支持对风险感知和冒险承担之间关系的双过程解释,根据这种关系,观察到的关系取决于问题中的线索是触发逐字记录还是要点处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号