...
首页> 外文期刊>Prosthetics and orthotics international >A work study of the CAD/CAM method and conventional manual method in the fabrication of spinal orthoses for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
【24h】

A work study of the CAD/CAM method and conventional manual method in the fabrication of spinal orthoses for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

机译:CAD / CAM方法和常规手动方法在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者脊柱矫形器制造中的工作研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A study was conducted to compare the CAD/CAM method with the conventional manual method in fabrication of spinal orthoses for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Ten subjects were recruited for this study. Efficiency analyses of the two methods were performed from cast filling/ digitization process to completion of cast/image rectification. The dimensional changes of the casts/ models rectified by the two cast rectification methods were also investigated. The results demonstrated that the CAD/CAM method was faster than the conventional manual method in the studied processes. The mean rectification time of the CAD/CAM method was shorter than that of the conventional manual method by 108.3 min (63.5%). This indicated that the CAD/CAM method took about 1/3 of the time of the conventional manual to finish cast rectification. In the comparison of cast/image dimensional differences between the conventional manual method and the CAD/CAM method, five major dimensions in each of the five rectified regions namely the axilla, thoracic, lumbar, abdominal and pelvic regions were involved. There were no significant dimensional differences (p < 0.05) in 19 out of the 25 studied dimensions. This study demonstrated that the CAD/CAM system could save the time in the rectification process and offer a relatively high resemblance in cast rectification as compared with the conventional manual method.
机译:进行了一项研究,以比较CAD / CAM方法与常规手动方法在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的脊柱矫形器制造中的作用。招募了十名受试者用于该研究。从铸件填充/数字化过程到铸件/图像矫正完成,对这两种方法进行了效率分析。还研究了通过两种铸件矫正方法矫正的铸件/模型的尺寸变化。结果表明,在研究过程中,CAD / CAM方法比常规的手动方法更快。 CAD / CAM方法的平均精馏时间比常规手动方法的平均精馏时间短108.3分钟(63.5%)。这表明,CAD / CAM方法花费了传统手册约1/3的时间来完成铸造精馏。在比较常规手动方法和CAD / CAM方法之间的投射/图像尺寸差异时,涉及到五个矫正区域(腋,胸,腰,腹和骨盆区域)的五个主要尺寸。在研究的25个维度中,有19个没有明显的维度差异(p <0.05)。这项研究表明,与传统的手动方法相比,CAD / CAM系统可以节省精馏过程的时间,并且在铸件精馏方面具有较高的相似度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号