...
首页> 外文期刊>Productions Animales >Philosophical perspective on causality in epidemiology - an interdisciplinary approach. [French]Original Title Regard philosophique sur la causalite en epidemiologie - approche interdisciplinaire.
【24h】

Philosophical perspective on causality in epidemiology - an interdisciplinary approach. [French]Original Title Regard philosophique sur la causalite en epidemiologie - approche interdisciplinaire.

机译:流行病因果关系的哲学观点-一种跨学科的方法。 [英文]原著流行病学因果关系的哲学研究-跨学科方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Different methods are used by the epidemiologist in order to get as close as possible to the causal nature of the relationship between a factor and a disease. However this is just an interpretation since different circumstances may randomly induce non-causal relationships between factors and disease, but also the effect of other interconnected factors. Philosophy identifies three levels of discussion in the use of causality: the distinction between absolute reality and the one perceived by man given his faculties of knowledge; the difficulty of identifying causes from the observation of natural phenomena because a link between phenomena does not necessarily mean causal succession; the problem of induction, in the sense that more conclusive experiments cannot provide definitive evidence, so that the falsificationists propose challenging the hypothesis by trying new tests to reject it. This interdisciplinary approach enhances the contribution of the philosophical perspective to the epidemiological practice, and more largely to research in biology: among others searching for study contexts adapted to challenge the results, establishing a combination of different and complementary arguments to get closer to causality, which draw a link to the ten causality criteria used by epidemiologists to evaluate and discuss the causal nature of a relationship. In conclusion, having a severe critical look at the result is the only way to add credit to the interpretation of a statistically significant relationship in terms of causality.
机译:流行病学家使用了不同的方法,以便尽可能地接近因素与疾病之间关系的因果关系。但这只是一种解释,因为不同的情况可能会随机诱发因素与疾病之间的非因果关系,还会引起其他相互关联的因素的影响。哲学在因果关系的使用中确定了三个层次的讨论:绝对现实与人因其知识能力而感知的区别。从自然现象的观察中很难识别原因,因为现象之间的联系并不一定意味着因果关系;在某种意义上,结论性的实验无法提供确定的证据,因此,证伪主义者提出了通过尝试新的测试来驳斥该假设的挑战。这种跨学科的方法增强了哲学观点对流行病学实践的贡献,并且在更大程度上对生物学研究做出了贡献:除其他外,寻找适合挑战性研究结果的研究背景,建立不同和互补论点的组合以更接近因果关系,绘制与流行病学家用来评估和讨论关系的因果关系的十个因果关系标准的链接。总而言之,对结果进行严格的批判性观察是在因果关系方面为统计上显着关系的解释加分的唯一方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号