首页> 外文期刊>Primary health care research & development >General Practitioners' coronary risk estimates, decisions to start lipid-lowering treatment, gender and length of clinical experience: their interactions in primary prevention
【24h】

General Practitioners' coronary risk estimates, decisions to start lipid-lowering treatment, gender and length of clinical experience: their interactions in primary prevention

机译:全科医生的冠心病风险估计,开始降脂治疗的决定,性别和临床经验的时间:他们在一级预防中的相互作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: We investigated whether the risk estimates of General Practitioners (GPs) and their treatment decisions mutually influence each other and whether factors not related to the patient's risk, such as the gender and length in clinical practice, interact. Background: The quantitative assessment of the absolute risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD) and the decision to start treatment with lipid-lowering drugs are crucial tasks in the primary prevention of CHD. Methods: Nine clinical vignettes, four rated high-risk and five rated low-risk according to the Framingham equation, were mailed to three groups of 90 randomly selected GPs in Stockholm. One group (R) was asked to estimate the risk of CHD within 10 years on a visual analogue scale. A second group (R 1 D) was asked to estimate the risk and to specify whether they would recommend a pharmacological lipid-lowering treatment. A third group (D) only to indicate whether they would recommend treatment. Results: Response rate ranged from 42.2% to 45.6%. The median risk estimates were higher in the R group than in the R 1 D group (difference not statistically significant). R 1 D group showed higher proportions of correct decisions to start treatment compared with the R group (86.2% versus 77.5%, P50.19). More correct decisions were made by female doctors (OR 1.77,95% CI 1.19-2.61, P 5 0.004) and by less experienced doctors (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, P5 0.016). Conclusions: The task of making CHD risk estimates and the task of making decisions whether to start lipid-lowering treatment do not seem to influence each other. The gender of physicians and the length of clinical experience seem to affect treatment decisions. Female GPs and less experienced GPs are more likely to make correct decisions. However, the relatively low response rate to the questionnaires may limit the generalizability of these results.
机译:目的:我们调查了全科医生(GPs)的风险估计及其治疗决策是否相互影响,以及与患者风险无关的因素,例如临床实践中的性别和时长是否相互影响。背景:发展为冠心病(CHD)的绝对风险的定量评估以及开始使用降脂药物的决定是CHD一级预防的关键任务。方法:将九个临床小插曲邮寄给斯德哥尔摩的三组,每组随机分为90个小组,分别按照Framingham方程式分为四个高风险类别和五个低风险类别。要求一组(R)以视觉模拟量表评估10年内冠心病的风险。第二组(R 1 D)被要求评估风险并明确他们是否会推荐药理降脂治疗。第三组(D)仅表明他们是否建议治疗。结果:回应率在42.2%至45.6%之间。 R组的中位风险估计值高于R 1 D组(差异无统计学意义)。与R组相比,R 1 D组显示正确决定开始治疗的比例更高(86.2%对77.5%,P50.19)。女医生(OR 1.77,95%CI 1.19-2.61,P 5 0.004)和经验不足的医生(OR 0.97,95%CI 0.95-0.99,P5 0.016)做出了更正确的决定。结论:进行CHD风险评估的任务与决定是否开始降脂治疗的任务似乎并没有相互影响。医师的性别和临床经验的长短似乎会影响治疗决策。女性全科医生和经验不足的全科医生更有可能做出正确的决定。但是,对问卷的答复率相对较低,可能会限制这些结果的普遍性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号