首页> 外文期刊>Perception & psychophysics >Does failure to mask T1 cause lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink?
【24h】

Does failure to mask T1 cause lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink?

机译:未能掩盖T1是否会在注意眨眼中引起lag-1备用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The attentional blink (AB) effect demonstrates that when participants are instructed to report two targets presented in a rapid visual stimuli stream, the second target (T2) is often unable to be reported correctly if presented 200-500 msec after the onset of the first target (T1). However, if T2 is presented immediately after T1, in the conventional lag-1 position (100-msec stimulus onset asynchrony; SOA), little or no performance deficit occurs. The present experiments add to the growing literature relating the "lag-1 sparing" effect to T1 masking. Using a canonical AB paradigm, our results demonstrate that T2 performance at lag 1 is significantly reduced in the presence of T1 masking. The implications of this outcome are discussed in relation to theories of the AB.
机译:注意眨眼(AB)效果表明,当指示参与者报告快速视觉刺激流中出现的两个目标时,如果第一个目标发作后200-500毫秒出现,则通常无法正确报告第二个目标(T2)目标(T1)。但是,如果在T1之后立即出现T2,则在传统的lag-1位置(100毫秒刺激开始异步; SOA)中,几乎没有或没有性能下降。本实验增加了有关“滞后1保留”效应与T1掩蔽有关的文献。使用规范的AB范式,我们的结果表明,在存在T1遮罩的情况下,滞后1的T2性能会大大降低。结合AB理论讨论了这一结果的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号