...
【24h】

Regulators should stop playing the greed card

机译:监管机构应停止打贪婪牌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In early February, Western GeoPower (WGP) announced its termination of a 20-year geothermal power purchase agreement (PPA) with Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E). A WGP press release explains that the company terminated the agreement because a regulatory approval condition had not been obtained within a 180-day time period stipulated in the PPA. WGP's CEO, Kenneth MacLeod, acknowledged in California Energy Markets, an energy trade publication, that increased prices for renewable power had made the PPA "less attractive" and that the ability to execute a new PPA at a higher price was in the company's best economic interest. In the same article, a spokesperson for the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) characterized WGP as motivated by "greed." The CPUC spokesperson was also quoted as saying that, while "legal," WGP's conduct was "a clear example of a seller using market power." What are the policy implications of this episode? Should it be, as the CPUC intimates, chalked up as an abuse by a "greedy" generator, or does it highlight a "major disconnect" in the pursuit of renewable power?
机译:2月初,Western GeoPower(WGP)宣布终止与太平洋天然气和电力公司(PG&E)签订的为期20年的地热发电购买协议(PPA)。 WGP的新闻稿解释说,该公司终止了协议,因为未在PPA规定的180天内获得监管批准条件。 WGP的首席执行官肯尼斯·麦克劳德(Kenneth MacLeod)在能源贸易出版物《加州能源市场》中承认,可再生能源价格的上涨使PPA“吸引力下降”,并且能够以更高的价格执行新的PPA是该公司的最佳经济效益。利益。在同一篇文章中,加利福尼亚公共事业委员会(CPUC)的发言人将WGP归因于“贪婪”。援引CPUC发言人的话说,虽然“合法”,但WGP的举动“是卖方利用市场力量的明显例子”。此事件的政策含义是什么?是否像CPUC所暗示的那样被“贪婪”的发电者滥用,还是在追求可再生能源方面突显了“重大脱节”?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号