首页> 外文期刊>Poiesis & praxis >Collingridge's dilemma and technoscience An attempt to provide a clarification from the perspective of the philosophy of science
【24h】

Collingridge's dilemma and technoscience An attempt to provide a clarification from the perspective of the philosophy of science

机译:科林里奇的困境和技术科学试图从科学哲学的角度进行澄清

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Collingridge's dilemma is one of the most well-established paradigms presenting a challenge to Technology Assessment (TA). This paper aims to reconstruct the dilemma from an analytic perspective and explicates three assumptions underlying the dilemma: the temporal, knowledge and power/actor assumptions. In the light of the recent transformation of the science, technology and innovation system—in the age of "technoscience"—these underlying assumptions are called into question. The same result is obtained from a normative angle by Collingridge himself; he criticises the dilemma and advances concepts on how to keep a technology controllable. This paper stresses the relevance of the dilemma and of Collingridge's own ideas on how to deal with the dilemma. Today, a positive interpretation of technoscience for effective TA is possible.
机译:Collingridge的困境是对技术评估(TA)提出挑战的最完善的范例之一。本文旨在从分析的角度重建困境,并阐明了陷入困境的三个假设:时间,知识和权力/行为者假设。在“技术科学”时代,鉴于科学,技术和创新体系的最新变革,这些基本假设受到质疑。 Collingridge本人从规范角度也获得了相同的结果。他批评了这一难题,并提出了有关如何使技术可控的概念。本文强调了困境的相关性和Collingridge自己关于如何解决困境的思想。如今,对技术科学进行有效TA的正面解释是可能的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号