首页> 外文期刊>Physical therapy in sport: official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine >Reproducibility and criterion-related validity of the sit and reach test and toe touch test for estimating hamstring flexibility in recreationally active young adults
【24h】

Reproducibility and criterion-related validity of the sit and reach test and toe touch test for estimating hamstring flexibility in recreationally active young adults

机译:坐和伸手可及性测试和脚趾触觉测试的重现性和与标准相关的有效性,用于评估活跃休闲的年轻人的ham绳肌灵活性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: 1) to examine the test-retest reproducibility and criterion-related validity of the sit and reach test (SRT) and the toe touch test (TT) for estimating hamstring flexibility measured through the passive straight leg raise test (PSLR); and 2) to determine whether the SRT cut-off scores may be used for the TT test to identify participants in this sample of young healthy adults as having short hamstring flexibility. Design: Test-retest design. Setting: Controlled laboratory environment. Participants: 243 active recreationally young adults. Main outcome measures: Participants performed the SRT, the TT test and PSLR twice in a randomized order with a 4-week interval between trials. Reproducibility was examined using typical percentage error (coefficient of variation [CV]) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as well as their respective confidence limits. Regression and Kappa correlation statistical analyses were performed to study the association of the SRT and TT test with the PSLR test and the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) between SRT and TT test were calculated to explore differences in the mean differences between these measurements. Results: The finding showed acceptable reproducibility measures for SRT (8.74% CV; 0.92 ICC), TT test (9.86% CV; 0.89 ICC) and PSLR (5.46% CV; 0.85 ICC). The SRT (R 2 = 0.63) and TT test (R 2 = 0.49) were significantly associated with PSLR. The 95% LoA between SRT and TT test reported systematic bias (2.84 cm) and wide 95% random error (±9.72 cm). Conclusions: Reproducibility of SRT, TT test and PSLR is acceptable and the criterion-related validity of SRT and TT test is moderate. Furthermore, the SRT cut-off scores should not be used for TT test for the detection of short hamstring muscles.
机译:目的:1)检查坐姿测试(SRT)和脚趾触觉测试(TT)的重测重试性和与标准相关的有效性,以评估通过被动直腿抬高测试(PSLR)测量的绳肌柔韧性; 2)确定SRT截止分数是否可用于TT测试,以识别该年轻健康成年人样本中的participants绳肌柔韧性短。设计:重测设计。地点:受控的实验室环境。参加人数:243名活跃的休闲青年。主要结局指标:参加者按随机顺序两次进行SRT,TT测试和PSLR,两次试验之间间隔4周。使用典型的百分比误差(变异系数[CV])和类内相关系数(ICC)以及它们各自的置信度极限来检查可重复性。进行了回归和Kappa相关性统计分析,以研究SRT和TT测试与PSLR测试的关联,并计算了SRT和TT测试之间的95%一致性限制(LoA),以探讨这些测量值之间的均值差异。结果:该发现表明,对于SRT(8.74%CV; 0.92 ICC),TT测试(9.86%CV; 0.89 ICC)和PSLR(5.46%CV; 0.85 ICC),可接受的重复性措施。 SRT(R 2 = 0.63)和TT测试(R 2 = 0.49)与PSLR显着相关。 SRT和TT测试之间的95%LoA报告了系统偏差(2.84 cm)和95%随机误差(±9.72 cm)。结论:SRT,TT试验和PSLR的可重复性是可以接受的,SRT和TT试验的标准相关有效性是中等的。此外,不应将SRT截止分数用于TT测试以检测短腿筋肌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号