首页> 外文期刊>Plant Breeding >Genome-wide association studies in elite varieties of German winter barley using single-marker and haplotype-based methods
【24h】

Genome-wide association studies in elite varieties of German winter barley using single-marker and haplotype-based methods

机译:使用单标记和基于单倍型的方法对德国冬季大麦的优良品种进行全基因组关联研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) became a widely used method to map qualitative and quantitative traits in plants. We compared existing single-marker and haplotype-based methods for GWAS with a focus on barley. Based on German winter barley cultivars, four different single-marker and haplotype-based methods were tested for their power to detect significant associations in a large genome with a limited number of markers. We identified significant associations for yield and quality-related traits using the iSelect array with 3886 mapped single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers in a structured population consisting of 109 genotypes. Genome simulations with different numbers of genotypes, marker densities and marker effects were used to compare different GWAS methods. Results of simulations revealed a higher power in detecting significant associations for haplotype- than for single-marker approaches, but showed a higher false discovery rate for SNP detection, due to lack of correction for population structure. Our simulations revealed that a population size of about 500 individuals is required to detect QTLs explaining a small trait variance (10%).
机译:全基因组关联研究(GWAS)成为一种广泛用于绘制植物定性和定量性状的方法。我们比较了现有的基于单标记和单倍型的GWAS方法,重点是大麦。基于德国冬季大麦栽培品种,测试了四种不同的基于单标记和基于单倍型的方法,以检测带有有限数量标记的大型基因组中重要关联的能力。我们使用iSelect阵列与由109个基因型组成的结构化群体中的3886个映射的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)标记物,确定了产量和质量相关性状的显着关联。使用具有不同数量的基因型,标记密度和标记效应的基因组模拟来比较不同的GWAS方法。模拟结果表明,与单标记方法相比,在检测单倍型显着关联方面具有更高的功效,但由于缺乏对种群结构的校正,因此对于SNP检测显示出更高的错误发现率。我们的模拟显示,检测QTL解释特质差异小(<10%)需要约500个个体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号