首页> 外文期刊>Physics of life reviews >Is cultural change adaptive?. Comment on 'An evolutionary framework for cultural change: Selectionism versus communal exchange' by Liane Gabora
【24h】

Is cultural change adaptive?. Comment on 'An evolutionary framework for cultural change: Selectionism versus communal exchange' by Liane Gabora

机译:文化变革是否具有适应性?利亚恩·加博拉(Liane Gabora)对“文化变革的进化框架:选择主义与社区交流”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Professor Gabora makes two principal arguments: First, that Darwinian or selectionist frameworks are not indicated for the modeling of cultural change; and, second, that non-Darwinian approaches, and more specifically, communal or network-based exchange models, are capable of yielding superior explanatory and predictive success. On the first point, I find Gabora's argument thoroughly convincing, though the reader should know I am an economist who has expressed skepticism toward attempts to model things like business success or failure, institutional change, or variegated market rules, by the generalization of natural selection (see). I am less convinced on the second point, particularly Gabora's intrepid claim, in reference to communal exchange, that "[i]f it took time for natural selection to emerge as the mechanism by which life evolves, it seems reasonable that culture, too, would evolve by way of this more primitive mechanism" (p. 19).
机译:伽博拉教授提出了两个主要论点:第一,达尔文主义或选择主义框架并未用于文化变革的模型。第二,非达尔文式的方法,更具体地说,是基于公共或基于网络的交换模型,能够产生出色的解释性和预测性成功。在第一点上,我发现盖博拉的论点完全令人信服,尽管读者应该知道我是一位经济学家,他对通过自然选择的普遍化来建模业务成功或失败,制度变革或多样化的市场规则等尝试表示怀疑。 (看到)。在第二点上,尤其是Gabora关于社区交换的无畏主张,我不太相信:“如果自然选择随着时间的发展而出现,那么自然选择就需要时间,文化也似乎是合理的,将会通过这种更为原始的机制发展起来”(第19页)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号