首页> 外文期刊>Water Research >A comparison of ARA and DNA data for microbial source tracking based on source-classification models developed using classification trees
【24h】

A comparison of ARA and DNA data for microbial source tracking based on source-classification models developed using classification trees

机译:基于使用分类树开发的来源分类模型的微生物来源跟踪的ARA和DNA数据的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The literature on microbial source tracking (MST) suggests that DNA analysis of fecal samples leads to more reliable determinations of bacterial sources of surface water contamination than antibiotic resistance analysis (ARA). Our goal is to determine whether the increased reliability, if any, in library-based MST developed with DNA data is sufficient to justify its higher cost, where the bacteria source predictions are used in TMDL surface water management programs. We describe an application of classification trees for MST applied to ARA and DNA data from samples collected in the Potomac River Watershed in Maryland. Conclusions concerning the comparison of ARA and DNA data, although preliminary at the current time, suggest that the added cost of obtaining DNA data in comparison to the cost of ARA data may not be justified, where MST is applied in TMDL surface water management programs.
机译:关于微生物来源跟踪(MST)的文献表明,粪便样品的DNA分析比抗生素抗性分析(ARA)能够更可靠地确定地表水污染的细菌来源。我们的目标是确定使用DNA数据开发的基于库的MST的可靠性提高(如果有的话)是否足以证明其较高的成本,而TMDL地表水管理程序中使用了细菌来源预测。我们描述了适用于ARA的MST分类树的应用以及来自马里兰州波托马克河流域收集的样本中的DNA数据。关于ARA和DNA数据比较的结论虽然目前尚处于初步阶段,但表明在TMDL地表水管理程序中应用MST的情况下,与ARA数据相比,获取DNA数据的额外成本可能不合理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号