首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Analyzing travel captivity by measuring the gap in travel satisfaction between chosen and alternative commute modes
【24h】

Analyzing travel captivity by measuring the gap in travel satisfaction between chosen and alternative commute modes

机译:通过测量所选和替代通勤模式的旅行满意度差距分析旅行圈养

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, we investigated travel captivity from the perspective of travel satisfaction. Using survey data from 565 commuters in Portland, Oregon, we compared satisfaction with the most recent commute trip (using the chosen mode) and hypothetical commute satisfaction if using an alternative mode. The difference in travel satisfaction between the chosen and alternative mode - referred to as the travel satisfaction gap - was used as a fine-grained proxy measure of travel captivity. Results indicate that active mode (walk/bicycle) users would be less satisfied when the alternative modes were auto or transit, while auto and transit commuters would be slightly more satisfied if they commuted by walking or bicycling. These outcomes suggest that auto users are most captive, while active travelers are mostly choice users. Results also show that respondents would be more satisfied with an alternative mode if it would enable more talking to other passengers.
机译:在这项研究中,我们从旅行满意度的角度调查了旅行囚禁。 使用来自俄勒冈州波特兰565个通勤者的调查数据,我们将满意与最近的通勤之旅(使用所选模式)和假设的通勤满足,如果使用替代模式。 所选和替代模式之间的旅行满意度的差异 - 被称为旅行满意度差距 - 被用作旅行圈养的细粒度代理衡量标准。 结果表明,当替代模式是自动或过境时,有源模式(步行/自行车)用户将不太满足,而自动和运输通勤者将在步行或骑自行车缩小时会稍微满足。 这些结果表明,自动用户最俘获,而活动旅行者主要是选择用户。 结果还表明,如果它能够更多地与其他乘客交谈,则受访者将更满意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号