...
首页> 外文期刊>Transport policy >The benefits of cooperative policies for transportation network protection from sea level rise: A case study of the San Francisco Bay Area
【24h】

The benefits of cooperative policies for transportation network protection from sea level rise: A case study of the San Francisco Bay Area

机译:海平面上涨运输网络保护合作政策的好处 - 以旧金山湾区为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This research investigates the influence of decision-maker behavior on policies that are likely to be adopted for the protection of highway infrastructure against inundations resulting from sea level rise. We analyze two different types of games to represent decision-maker behavior, and use the San Francisco Bay Area shoreline with a scenario of a 0.5 m sea level rise as a case study, which is expected in 2054. In our model, the objective of the decision-makers (the counties bordering the SF Bay Area) is to minimize the traffic delay caused by inundations in the transportation network that lies in the geographical boundaries of their counties.Our model considers hydrodynamic interactions, traffic flow patterns changes as a result of inundations, and budget constraints on the protection costs. The hydrodynamics in the Bay Area are affected by the shoreline protection strategy: protection of the shoreline of a county may lead to increased inundations in another, unprotected, county. Furthermore, closure of a highway link in one county affects traffic delays in other counties due to traffic re-routing. Thus, protection decisions made by a county have potential impacts on several other counties, and therefore counties must take into account other counties' actions.Both competitive (Nash) and cooperative games are analyzed. A Nash equilibrium is achieved among the counties when each acts to minimize its objective without the possibility of collaborating with other counties. We compare the results of Nash games with possible cooperation strategies for a range of funding scenarios. It is shown, through several examples, that cooperation among counties increases benefits (reduction of Vehicle Hours Traveled) for all participants in most cases. In some cases, cooperation also reduces protection costs. We have identified that there are counties that are not beneficial to protect, in terms of traffic delay minimization, such as Napa, while other counties for which protection is critical, such as Marin. However, these results depend on the formation of the collaborations and the available budget, and therefore our conclusions cannot be generalized.
机译:本研究调查了决策者行为对可能采用的政策的影响,这些政策可能采用海平面上升导致洪垦的公路基础设施。我们分析了两种不同类型的游戏来代表决策者行为,并使用旧金山湾区海岸线与0.5米的海平面上升的场景,作为一个案例研究,预计在2054年。在我们的模型中,目标决策者(接壤的县)是最大限度地减少在其县地理边界的运输网络中淹没引起的交通延误。我们的模型考虑了流体动力学相互作用,因此流量模式因对保护成本的洪水和预算限制。海湾地区的流体动力学受海岸线保护策略的影响:保护县海岸线可能导致另一个,不受保护的县内的洪水增加。此外,由于流量重新路由,在一个县中的高速公路链接关闭了其他县的交通延误。因此,县的保护决定对其他几个县产生了潜在影响,因此县必须考虑其他县的诉讼。分析竞争力(纳什)和合作博弈。县中的纳什均衡在县中实现,以便在没有与其他县合作的可能性的情况下最小化其目标。我们将纳什比赛的结果与各种资金方案进行了可能的合作策略。通过若干例子显示,在大多数情况下,县之间的合作增加了所有参与者的福利(在所有参与者上行)。在某些情况下,合作也降低了保护成本。我们已经确定,在交通延误最小化(如纳帕)的情况下,有没有有利于保护的县,而其他县的保护是至关重要的,如Marin。但是,这些结果依赖于合作和可用预算的形成,因此我们的结论不能概括。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号