...
首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASAE >TRACTOR TIRE ASPECT RATIO EFFECTS TRACTOR TIRE ASPECT RATIO EFFECTS ON SOIL STRESSES AND RUT DEPTHSON SOIL STRESSES AND RUT DEPTHS
【24h】

TRACTOR TIRE ASPECT RATIO EFFECTS TRACTOR TIRE ASPECT RATIO EFFECTS ON SOIL STRESSES AND RUT DEPTHSON SOIL STRESSES AND RUT DEPTHS

机译:拖拉机轮胎纵横比对土壤应力和车辙深度的影响拖拉机轮胎纵横比对土壤应力和车辙深度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A 580/70R38 tractor drive tire with an aspect ratio of 0.756 and a 650/75R32 tire with an aspect ratio of 0.804 were operated at two dynamic loads and two inflation pressures on a sandy loam and a clay loam with loose soil above a hardpan. Soil stresses were determined just above the hardpan beneath the centerlines and edges of the tires. Rut depths were measured at the centerline and edge of each tire track. The octahedral shear stress and rut depth were not significantly different for the tires. The peak octahedral normal stress was not significantly different for the two tires when the dynamic load was 17.2 kN, but was significantly greater for the 650/75R32 tire when the dynamic load was 30.9 kN. Soil stresses and rut depths increased with increasing dynamic load at constant inflation pressure, and with increasing inflation pressure at constant dynamic load. Net traction and tractive efficiency decreased with increasing inflation pressure at constant dynamic load. At constant inflation pressure, tractive efficiency increased with increasing dynamic load. In comparisons of the centerline and edge locations, soil stresses were significantly less beneath the edges than the centerlines of the tires. Ratios of the mean stress beneath the centerline to the mean beneath the edge for four combinations of dynamic load and inflation pressure ranged from 2.18 to 3.77 for the peak octahedral normal stress and 1.76 to 3.18 for the corresponding octahedral shear stress. Ratios of the rut depth at the centerline to the edge ranged from 1.04 to 1.49. In summary, for these two tires with their slightly different aspect ratios, no fundamental differences were found that would clearly indicate that one tire was better than the other.
机译:在砂土壤土和硬质土壤上方具有松散土壤的黏土壤土上,在两个动态载荷和两个充气压力下,运行纵横比为0.756的580 / 70R38拖拉机驱动轮胎和纵横比为0.804的650 / 75R32轮胎。确定土壤应力的位置刚好位于轮胎中心线和边缘下方的硬底上方。在每个轮胎轨道的中心线和边缘测量车辙深度。轮胎的八面体剪切应力和车辙深度没有显着差异。当动态载荷为17.2 kN时,两个轮胎的峰值八面体法向应力没有显着差异,但是当动态载荷为30.9 kN时,650 / 75R32轮胎的八面体正应力峰值却明显更大。在恒定充气压力下,土壤应力和车辙深度随着动态载荷的增加而增加,而在恒定动态载荷下,土壤压力和车辙深度随充气压力的增加而增加。在恒定动态载荷下,净牵引力和牵引效率随着充气压力的增加而降低。在恒定的充气压力下,牵引效率随着动态负载的增加而增加。在中心线和边缘位置的比较中,边缘下方的土壤应力明显小于轮胎的中心线。对于动态载荷和充气压力的四种组合,中心线下方的平均应力与边缘下方的平均应力之比在八面体法向峰值应力范围为2.18至3.77,在相应八面体剪切应力范围为1.76至3.18。中心线与边缘的车辙深度之比为1.04至1.49。总而言之,对于这两个轮胎的长宽比略有不同,没有发现根本的差异,这显然表明一个轮胎比另一个轮胎更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号