首页> 外文期刊>Town and Country Planning >Shouldn't we get the homes we need, not just what we're given?
【24h】

Shouldn't we get the homes we need, not just what we're given?

机译:我们不应该得到我们需要的家,而不仅仅是我们所赐的家园吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Home is the anchor point from which we build our lives. When the core elements of safety, comfort, space to grow and long-term security are present, our home underpins our capacity to lead healthy, fulfilling lives. It cannot be an unreasonable expectation that, whatever our social background, stage of life or level of disability, these core elements should be a given for housing development in 21 st-century Britain. But it has to be questioned whether this is a vision currently shared by the development industry and government. The Grenfell Tower fire serves as a horrific and undeniable depiction of the degree to which the development sector has disregarded the goal of building homes that enable residents to lead healthy, fulfilling lives, in favour of the pursuit of cost-cutting and maximisation of profit. In her review of fire safety and building regulation, Dame Judith Hackitt found that the combination of factors that made the Grenfell Tower fire possible represent a 'cultural' issue within the construction industry, consisting of ignorance, indifference, lack of clarity on roles and responsibilities, and inadequate regulatory oversight and enforcement, which she describes as a 'race to the bottom'.
机译:家是我们建立生活的锚点。当安全,舒适性,长期安全的核心要素时,我们的房屋巩固了我们的能力,以领导健康,实现生命。无论是我们的社会背景,生命阶段还是残疾水平,这些核心要素都应该是在21世纪英国的住房发展中提供的不合理的期望。但必须质疑这是否是开发行业和政府目前共享的愿景。 Grenfell Tower Fire作为发展部门忽视建筑物目标的程度的可怕和不可否认的描述,使居民能够领导健康,实现生活,赞成追求成本削减和最大化利润。在她对消防安全和建筑规则的审查中,Dame Judith Hackitt发现,使Grenfell Tower Fire的因素的结合代表了建筑行业内的“文化”问题,包括无知,漠不关心,缺乏角色和责任缺乏清晰度,监管监督和执法不足,她将其描述为“底部的比赛”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号