首页> 外文期刊>Town and Country Planning >Shouldn't we get the homes we need, not just what we're given?
【24h】

Shouldn't we get the homes we need, not just what we're given?

机译:我们不应该获得所需的房屋,而不仅仅是获得的房屋吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Home is the anchor point from which we build our lives. When the core elements of safety, comfort, space to grow and long-term security are present, our home underpins our capacity to lead healthy, fulfilling lives. It cannot be an unreasonable expectation that, whatever our social background, stage of life or level of disability, these core elements should be a given for housing development in 21 st-century Britain. But it has to be questioned whether this is a vision currently shared by the development industry and government. The Grenfell Tower fire serves as a horrific and undeniable depiction of the degree to which the development sector has disregarded the goal of building homes that enable residents to lead healthy, fulfilling lives, in favour of the pursuit of cost-cutting and maximisation of profit. In her review of fire safety and building regulation, Dame Judith Hackitt found that the combination of factors that made the Grenfell Tower fire possible represent a 'cultural' issue within the construction industry, consisting of ignorance, indifference, lack of clarity on roles and responsibilities, and inadequate regulatory oversight and enforcement, which she describes as a 'race to the bottom'.
机译:家是我们赖以生存的基础。当存在安全性,舒适性,成长空间和长期安全性的核心要素时,我们的家园将巩固我们过上健康,充实生活的能力。不论我们的社会背景,生活阶段或残疾水平如何,这些核心要素都应该作为21世纪英国住房发展的前提,这是一个不合理的期望。但是必须质疑,这是否是发展行业和政府当前共同的愿景。 Grenfell塔楼大火是对发展部门无视建造房屋使居民过上健康,充实生活,支持追求成本削减和利润最大化的目标的严重程度和不可否认的描述。在审查消防安全和建筑法规时,朱迪思·哈克特女士发现,使格伦菲尔大厦发生火灾的各种因素的组合代表了建筑业中的一个“文化”问题,包括无知,冷漠,角色和责任不明确,以及监管不力和执法不力,她形容这是“自下而上的竞赛”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号