首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Decision >A parametric analysis of prospect theory's functionals for the general population
【24h】

A parametric analysis of prospect theory's functionals for the general population

机译:对一般人群的前景理论功能的参数分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article presents the results of an experiment that completely measures the utility function and probability weighting function for different positive and negative monetary outcomes, using a representative sample of N= 1,935 from the general public. The results confirm earlier findings in the lab, suggesting that utility is less pronounced than what is found in classical measurements where expected utility is assumed. Utility for losses is found to be convex, consistent with diminishing sensitivity, and the obtained loss-aversion coefficient of 1.6 is moderate but in agreement with contemporary evidence. The estimated probability weighting functions have an inverse-S shape and they imply pessimism in both domains. These results show that probability weighting is also an important phenomenon in the general population. Women and lower educated individuals are found to be more risk averse, in agreement with common findings. In contrast to previous studies that ascribed gender differences in risk attitudes solely to differences in the degree utility curvature, however, our results show that this finding is primarily driven by loss aversion and, for women, also by a more pessimistic psychological response toward the probability of obtaining the best possible outcome.
机译:本文介绍了一个实验的结果,该实验使用来自公众的N = 1,935的代表性样本,完全测量了不同的正面和负面货币结果的效用函数和概率加权函数。结果证实了实验室中较早的发现,表明效用不如假定期望效用的经典测量方法明显。发现损失的效用是凸的,与灵敏度的降低相一致,并且获得的损失规避系数为1.6,中等,但与现代证据一致。估计的概率加权函数具有反S形状,并且在两个域中都表示悲观情绪。这些结果表明,概率加权也是普通人群中的重要现象。与普遍的发现一致,发现女性和文化程度较低的人对风险的厌恶程度更高。与以前的研究仅将性别差异归因于效用曲率度差异的风险研究相反,我们的结果表明,这一发现主要是由对损失的厌恶驱动的,对于女性而言,也是由对概率的更悲观的心理反应所驱动获得最好的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号