首页> 外文期刊>The Business Lawyer >Rullca Section 301-the Fortunate Consequences (and Continuing Questions) Of Distinguishing Apparent Agency And Decisional Authority
【24h】

Rullca Section 301-the Fortunate Consequences (and Continuing Questions) Of Distinguishing Apparent Agency And Decisional Authority

机译:Rullca第301条-区分表观代理机构和决策机构的幸运后果(和后续问题)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act ("RULLCA"), finalized in 2006, adopts a unique formulation rejecting statutory apparent agency authority on behalf of the company. Further, in the member-managed limited liability company, it separates inter se decisional authority from the ability to bind the entity. We trace the history of this development in what is now the dominant form of business organization, explain the objectives and operation of section 301 of RULLCA and its relationship to those provisions addressing inter se decisional authority, and discuss the transition issues that will be faced in a state that adopts RULLCA after having followed the traditional member-managed versus manager-managed paradigm.
机译:经修订的《统一有限责任公司法》(“ RULLCA”)于2006年最终确定,采用了独特的表述,代表该公司拒绝法定的明显代理机构的授权。此外,在会员管理的有限责任公司中,它将内部决策权与约束实体的能力区分开来。我们以现在的商业组织的主要形式追溯这一发展的历史,解释RULLCA 301节的目标和运作及其与处理内部决策权的规定的关系,并讨论将面临的过渡问题。在遵循传统的成员管理与经理管理的范式之后采用RULLCA的州。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号