【24h】

Leader & Comment

机译:领导者与方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Architecture minister Margaret Hodge has made her amateur views on architecture abundantly clear long before her decision not to list Birmingham Central Library. But her attitude, and the debate it provokes, brings to light one of the paradoxes of modern heritage. We must think harder about why some modernist buildings are still so unpopular. While it is hazardous to generalise about the many modernisms of the 20th century, the kinds of buildings we are looking at here (Birmingham's Bullring was one, the library another) find so little popular support that 'expert opinion' - from English Heritage and parts of the architectural profession, in this case - is often their sole defence against destruction.
机译:在决定不列出伯明翰中央图书馆之前,建筑部长玛格丽特·霍奇(Margaret Hodge)很清楚地表明了她对建筑的业余观点。但是她的态度及其引发的争论,揭露了现代遗产的悖论之一。我们必须更加努力地思考为什么一些现代主义建筑仍然如此不受欢迎。概括20世纪的许多现代主义是很危险的,但我们在这里看到的各种建筑(伯明翰的斗牛场是一幢,图书馆是另一座)受到很少的支持,以至于“专家意见”-来自英国的传统和部分在这种情况下,建筑专业人士通常是防御破坏的唯一辩护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号