首页> 外文期刊>Technology and Culture >'A Big Machine Not Working Properly'
【24h】

'A Big Machine Not Working Properly'

机译:“一台大机器不能正常工作”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article argues against the common assumption in the field of development studies about "depoliticization" of the terrain in which development is conceived, implemented, and received. Taking the case of the history of "community development project" in India between 1952 and 1958, it makes the case that technocratic development in post-independence India involved a case of active, all around politics of negotiation. India's postcolonial elites were quite self-consciously geared to "own" the program in the name of nation and nation-building. The subjects of development were not passive either. It is certainly possible to read their politics of resistance in the process of development's implementation and in elite narratives of development.
机译:本文反对在发展研究领域中关于构想,实施和接受发展的地形“非政治化”的普遍假设。以1952年至1958年印度“社区发展计划”的历史为例,它证明了独立后印度的技术官僚发展涉及围绕谈判政治的积极案例。印度的后殖民精英很自觉地以国家和国家建设的名义“拥有”该计划。发展的主题也不是被动的。当然,有可能在发展的实施过程中以及在发展的精英叙事中阅读他们的抵抗政治。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Technology and Culture》 |2019年第4期|1027-1058|共32页
  • 作者

    PRAKASH KUMAR;

  • 作者单位

    Pennsylvania State University with interest in the history of agrarian development and modernization in colonial and postcolonial India;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号