首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Three senses of paradigm in scenario methodology: A preliminary framework and systematic approach for using intuitive logics scenarios to change mental models and improve strategic decision-making in situations of discontinuity
【24h】

Three senses of paradigm in scenario methodology: A preliminary framework and systematic approach for using intuitive logics scenarios to change mental models and improve strategic decision-making in situations of discontinuity

机译:场景方法学的三种范式:在不连续的情况下使用直观逻辑场景来改变思维模型和改善战略决策的初步框架和系统方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article outlines the objectives, activities, and achievements of using intuitive logics scenarios to improve strategic decision-making in situations of discontinuity. Pierre Wack's work at Royal Dutch/Shell illustrates the use of exploratory, reframing, and decision scenarios to change the mental models of decision-makers in advance of the 1973 oil crisis. Thomas S. Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions offers a promising theoretical account of paradigm shifts in science, but its application is limited by the ambiguity of the concept of paradigm. Margaret Masterman's distinction of three senses of paradigm - introduced as construct paradigm, worldview paradigm, and action paradigm - clarifies and extends these accounts to support a preliminary framework and systematic approach. Overall, this investigation expands our understanding of strategic decision-making as guided not only by analytic achievements and developmental investigations but also by discontinuous breaks that can be explored and addressed using scenario methodology.Section 1 provides an introduction and literature review. Section 2 examines the scenarios developed at Royal Dutch/Shell. Section 3 summarizes Kuhn's new image of science, clarified by Masterman's three senses of paradigm in Section 4. Section 5 presents implications for scenario methodology, followed by conclusions and areas for research in Section 6.
机译:本文概述了在不连续的情况下使用直观逻辑方案来改善战略决策的目标,活动和成就。皮埃尔·瓦克(Pierre Wack)在荷兰皇家壳牌公司(Royal Dutch / Shell)所做的工作表明,在1973年石油危机之前,使用探索性,重新构架和决策方案来改变决策者的思维模式。托马斯·库恩(Thomas S. Kuhn)的《科学革命的结构》为科学范式转换提供了有希望的理论解释,但其应用受到范式概念含混不清的限制。玛格丽特·马斯特曼(Margaret Masterman)对三种范式的区别-构造范式,世界观范式和行动范式进行了介绍-阐明并扩展了这些论述以支持初步的框架和系统的方法。总体而言,本研究不仅通过分析成果和发展研究,而且通过可以使用情景方法论进行探索和解决的不连续性中断,扩大了我们对战略决策的理解。第1节提供了引言和文献综述。第2部分研究了Royal Dutch / Shell开发的方案。第3节总结了库恩的新科学形象,在第4节中通过Masterman的三种范式进行了澄清。第5节介绍了场景方法论的含义,然后在第6节中提出了结论和研究领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号