首页> 外文期刊>Futures >The critical role of history in scenario thinking: Augmenting causal analysis within the intuitive logics scenario development methodology
【24h】

The critical role of history in scenario thinking: Augmenting causal analysis within the intuitive logics scenario development methodology

机译:历史在场景思维中的关键作用:在直观逻辑场景开发方法中增强因果分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The historian Eric Hobsbawm stated that 'The safest empirical generalization about history is still that nobody heeds its obvious lessons much'. Whether at a macroeconomic level or within individual organisations there are numerous examples of this, such as the economic crash of 2008, the causes of which had many parallels with those that caused the great depression 80 years previously. On the other hand however, overly-relying on the past as a guide to the future has its own obvious dangers not least that important future events may have no past precedent. As such, the present paper firstly provides a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of using the past as a guide to the future. It then examines the role of history in scenario work, arguing that history should receive greater emphasis as part of the scenario planning process. We suggest changes to the standard Intuitive Logics (IL) approach to scenario planning which would render learning from history a more central component of the scenario process, in contrast to its current peripheral role. Rather than diminishing scenario planning's ability to facilitate a consideration of how the future may differ from the past, we show how a greater emphasis on history can enhance consideration of the causality of future change. An adapted IL that has more emphasis on historical analysis can augment scenario planning's effectiveness as a tool for consideration of the future. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:历史学家埃里克·霍布斯鲍姆(Eric Hobsbawm)表示:“关于历史的最安全的经验总结仍然是,没有人会非常注意其明显的教训”。无论是在宏观经济层面还是在单个组织内部,都有很多这样的例子,例如2008年的经济崩溃,其原因与80年前造成大萧条的原因有很多相似之处。但是,另一方面,过分依赖过去来指导未来有其自身的明显危险,尤其是重要的未来事件可能没有过去的先例。因此,本文首先讨论了使用过去作为未来指南的优缺点。然后,它探讨了历史在方案工作中的作用,认为历史应该作为方案规划过程的一部分而受到更大的重视。我们建议对场景规划的标准直觉逻辑(IL)方法进行更改,这将使从历史中学习成为场景流程的更重要组成部分,而不是其当前的外围角色。我们并没有减少场景规划的能力来促进对未来可能与过去的不同的思考,而是向我们展示了如何更加强调历史可以增强对未来变化因果关系的考虑。经过改编的IL更加注重历史分析,可以增强方案规划作为考虑未来的工具的有效性。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Futures》 |2016年第3期|56-66|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Strathclyde, Dept Strategy & Org, Strathclyde Business Sch, 199 Cathedral St, Glasgow G4 0QU, Lanark, Scotland;

    Middlesex Univ, Ctr Enterprise & Econ Dev Res CEEDR, London NW4 4BT, England;

    Univ Strathclyde, Strathclyde Business Sch, Dept Strategy & Org, 199 Cathedral St, Glasgow G4 0QU, Lanark, Scotland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Scenario planning; History; Causation; Learning;

    机译:场景规划;历史;因果;学习;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号