...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical infections >Is It Necessary To Place Prophylactically an Abdominal Drain To Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Abdominal Operations? A Systematic Meta-Review
【24h】

Is It Necessary To Place Prophylactically an Abdominal Drain To Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Abdominal Operations? A Systematic Meta-Review

机译:是否有必要在腹部进行预防性排泄以防止手术部位感染?系统的元审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: There is still uncertainty regarding the use of prophylactic drainage in abdominal surgical procedures. This meta-review aimed to summarize systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating abdominal drain placement in patients undergoing abdominal procedures, with a focus on surgical site infection and death from infections. Methods: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses identified in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization Regional Medical Databases, and African Index Medicus were reviewed. Results: Fifteen systematic reviews and meta-analyses concerning prophylactic abdominal drainage in abdominal operations were included in this analysis. The median score of methodologic quality was eight (6-10). The majority of meta-analyses found no benefits of prophylactic drainage in reducing surgical site infection, but no significant differences were identified. Three studies demonstrated a significant difference in favor of no drainage, with two regarding cholecystectomy and one on appendectomy (p<0.05). The quality of evidence provided by each review was mainly low and very low. Conclusions: Most reviews fail to detect an increased incidence of surgical site infection in the setting of drainage placement but also fail to attribute any specific benefits to the presence of a drain in abdominal procedures.
机译:背景:在腹部外科手术中使用预防性引流仍存在不确定性。本荟萃综述旨在总结系统评价和荟萃分析,评估接受腹部手术的患者的腹腔引流位置,重点在于手术部位感染和感染死亡。方法:对在MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINHAL,Cochrane对照试验中心登记册,世界卫生组织区域医学数据库和《非洲索引医学》中确定的系统评价和荟萃分析进行了回顾。结果:该分析包括十五项关于预防腹部手术的腹部引流的系统评价和荟萃分析。方法学质量的中位数为八(6-10)。大多数荟萃分析未发现预防性引流在减少手术部位感染方面无益处,但未发现明显差异。三项研究显示了不引流的显着差异,其中两项涉及胆囊切除术,一项涉及阑尾切除术(p <0.05)。每次审查提供的证据质量主要是非常低和非常低。结论:大多数评论未能发现引流位置导致手术部位感染的发生率增加,而且未能将任何特殊的益处归因于腹部手术中引流的存在。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Surgical infections》 |2016年第6期|730-738|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Nanjing Univ, Jinling Hosp, Dept Surg, Sch Med, 305 East Zhongshan Rd, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China;

    Nanjing Univ, Jinling Hosp, Dept Surg, Sch Med, 305 East Zhongshan Rd, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China;

    WHO, Infect Prevent & Control Unit, Dept Serv Delivery & Safety, Geneva, Switzerland;

    Nanjing Univ, Jinling Hosp, Dept Surg, Sch Med, 305 East Zhongshan Rd, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China;

    Nanjing Univ, Jinling Hosp, Dept Surg, Sch Med, 305 East Zhongshan Rd, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号