首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Replies to the Replies
【24h】

Replies to the Replies

机译:对答复的答复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is precisely because I know that this is Jay Labinger's view that I was surprised to find, in this conversation about science studies of which he is an editor, what seemed to be easily corrected misreadings of one participant by another. These misreadings made those who committed them talk past, rather than to, those whom they misread by causing them to respond to statements that had not been made instead of to ones that had. Nevertheless, contrary to what Labinger infers from a remark that he quotes from my review, I do not believe that, in a case of this kind, God wants the editor to suggest, much less request, that his authors correct what he believes to be misreadings. My thought was rather that if a response by one author to another seemed as if it might rest on a misreading, then God might want the editor to call this to the attention of the respondent.
机译:正是因为我知道这是杰伊·拉宾格的观点,让我惊讶地发现,在他作为主编的有关科学研究的对话中,似乎很容易纠正一个参与者对另一个参与者的误读。这些误读使承诺犯下这些错误的人过去,而不是与他们误读的那些人发生谈话,原因是使他们对未作出的陈述作出回应,而不是对已作出的陈述作出回应。然而,与拉宾格从他在我的评论中引述的言论所得出的结论相反,我认为在这种情况下,上帝不希望编辑建议的作者少得多,而是要求作者更正他认为的内容。误读。我的想法是,如果一位作者对另一位作者的答复似乎是误读,那么上帝可能希望编辑将其称为引起被访者注意的内容。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Social Studies of Science》 |2004年第1期|p.115-132|共18页
  • 作者

    Gabriel Stolzenberg;

  • 作者单位

    1 Richdale Ave, Unit 11, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 科学研究理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号