...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE sensors journal >Anchor Loss Variation in MEMS Wine-Glass Mode Disk Resonators Due to Fluctuating Fabrication Process
【24h】

Anchor Loss Variation in MEMS Wine-Glass Mode Disk Resonators Due to Fluctuating Fabrication Process

机译:由于制造工艺的波动,MEMS酒杯模式磁盘谐振器的锚固损耗变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With increasing demand for high-frequency, high-quality factor (Q-factor) mechanical resonators, the Q-factor declining issue at high-frequency becomes increasingly prominent. This paper studies the performance variations of disk resonators under the wine-glass vibration mode due to the support beam offset that are caused by process deviations. The formula of the Q-factor in terms of the support loss is derived to further illustrate the change of the Q-factor caused by the beam offset. It is found that the impact of the extensional mode on the performance is more serious than that of the flexural mode, since the extensional mode may destruct the mode shape and decrease the radial size (i.e., amplitude) of the disk. Finally, some design methods on how to improve the Q-factor of the resonator are given. The numerical results show that there are, respectively, 0.07% and 13.7% increase in the resonant frequency and the disk radial size when the support beam offset is 4°, whereas the increase in the resonant frequency and the disk radial size becomes 0.96% and 69.8%, respectively, when the support beam offset reaches 16°. For the Q-factor, although the flexural-mode Q-factor, Qf, increases with increasing support beam offset, the overall Q-factor of the resonator still decreases due to the dominant extensional-mode loss. In the worst case, the largest decline reaches 27.11% from the zero offset position (where there is only flexural-mode loss) to the 16° offset position.
机译:随着对高频,高质量因子(Q因子)机械谐振器的需求增加,在高频下Q因子下降的问题变得越来越突出。本文研究了在酒杯振动模式下,由于工艺偏差引起的支撑梁偏移,磁盘谐振器的性能变化。推导了基于支撑损耗的Q因子公式,以进一步说明由光束偏移引起的Q因子变化。已经发现,拉伸模式对性能的影响比弯曲模式更严重,因为拉伸模式可能破坏模式形状并减小盘的径向尺寸(即振幅)。最后,给出了一些如何提高谐振器Q因子的设计方法。数值结果表明,当支撑梁偏移为4°时,共振频率和圆盘径向尺寸分别增加0.07%和13.7%,而共振频率和圆盘径向尺寸的增加分别为0.96%和13.7%。当支撑梁偏移达到16°时分别为69.8%。对于Q因子,尽管挠曲模式Q因子Qf随着支撑梁偏移的增加而增加,但谐振器的整体Q因子由于主要的拉伸模式损耗而仍然降低。在最坏的情况下,从零偏移位置(只有弯曲模式损耗)到16°偏移位置的最大下降幅度达到27.11%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《IEEE sensors journal》 |2016年第18期|6846-6856|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Key Laboratory of RF Circuits and Systems, Ministry of Education, School of Electronics and Information, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China;

    Key Laboratory of RF Circuits and Systems, Ministry of Education, School of Electronics and Information, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China;

    Key Laboratory of RF Circuits and Systems, Ministry of Education, School of Electronics and Information, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China;

    Key Laboratory of RF Circuits and Systems, Ministry of Education, School of Electronics and Information, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China;

    Key Laboratory of RF Circuits and Systems, Ministry of Education, School of Electronics and Information, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Vibrations; Q-factor; Sensors; Resonant frequency; Energy loss; Optical resonators; Propagation losses;

    机译:振动;Q因子;传感器;谐振频率;能量损耗;光学谐振器;传播损耗;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号