首页> 外文期刊>Scientometrics >PEER REVIEW-EXPERIENCE AT NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LEVEL
【24h】

PEER REVIEW-EXPERIENCE AT NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LEVEL

机译:国家和欧洲水平的同行评审经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A leading authority in the field of academic quality assessment and quality insurance, Professor Becher, 1989, characterizes the mechanism of peer review in a way which illustrates adequately both the strength and the weakness of that institution. He writes: "most of those who advocate parliamentary democracy as a method of government are prepared to acknowledge its manifold weaknesses: their defence of it rests on the claim that there is no preferable substitute. So too, it can be argued, the exercise of peer group judgement must be tolerated, for all its admitted faults, because no one has yet come up with an approach for academic evaluation that would not be discernibly worse".
机译:Becher教授(1989)是学术质量评估和质量保险领域的领导机构,以充分说明该机构的优势和劣势的方式来描述同行评审的机制。他写道:“大多数主张将议会民主作为政府手段的人都准备承认其民主的诸多弱点:他们对议会民主的捍卫在于没有可替代的替代品的主张。因此,可以说,行使对于同行小组的所有公认的缺点,必须容忍他们的评判,因为还没有人提出一种不会明显恶化的学术评估方法。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Scientometrics》 |1999年第3期|491-495|共5页
  • 作者

    S.STROMHOLM;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 计量学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:48:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号