...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientific studies of reading >Have We Forsaken Reading Theory in the Name of 'Quick Fix' Interventions for Children With Reading Disability?
【24h】

Have We Forsaken Reading Theory in the Name of 'Quick Fix' Interventions for Children With Reading Disability?

机译:我们是否以“快速解决”干预的名义抛弃了阅读障碍儿童的阅读理论?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Our contribution to this special issue on reading theory questions the effectiveness of the prevailing interventions intended to improve word-reading and reading comprehension skills in children with reading disability (RD). Our hypothesis is that we as a field may have inadvertently diluted reading theory in ways that compromise the power of intervention programs. For both word reading and reading comprehension we argue that current intervention programs target instruction at a knowledge level below that which is necessary to foster reading skill development that is generative in children with RD. Further, we contend that current interventions for children with RD fail to mimic and promote the inductive learning mechanisms that characterize typical reading development. Thus, we return to reading theory in an attempt to identify ways that current interventions may be reconceptualized to treat word-reading and reading comprehension deficits. In doing so, we call for the development of a new generation of reading interventions that target the fundamental knowledge structures and learning mechanisms known to support typical reading development.
机译:我们对阅读理论特刊的贡献质疑旨在改善阅读障碍儿童(RD)的单词阅读和阅读理解能力的现行干预措施的有效性。我们的假设是,作为一个领域,我们可能会无意中削弱阅读理论,从而削弱干预计划的力量。对于单词阅读和阅读理解,我们认为,当前的干预计划的目标目标是低于能够促进RD儿童产生阅读技能发展所必需的知识水平的指导。此外,我们认为当前针对RD儿童的干预措施无法模仿和促进典型阅读发展特征的归纳学习机制。因此,我们回到阅读理论,以试图确定可以重新概念化当前干预措施以处理单词阅读和阅读理解能力缺陷的方式。为此,我们呼吁开发新一代的阅读干预措施,这些干预措施的目标是已知的基础知识结构和学习机制可以支持典型的阅读发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号