首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Estimating daily evapotranspiration in the agricultural-pastoral ecotone in Northwest China: A comparative analysis of the Complementary Relationship, WRF-CLM4.0, and WRF-Noah methods
【24h】

Estimating daily evapotranspiration in the agricultural-pastoral ecotone in Northwest China: A comparative analysis of the Complementary Relationship, WRF-CLM4.0, and WRF-Noah methods

机译:中国西北农业牧区生态龙估算日常蒸散:互补关系,WRF-CLM4.0和WRF-NOAH方法的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Accurate estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) over regional scale is essential for ecohydrological research, agricultural production, and water resources management. However, few studies have been done to estimate regional ET in data lacking, highly heterogeneous arid areas such as the Agricultural-Pastoral Ecotone in Northwest China (APENC). In this study, we compared three actual ET-estimation methods driven by Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model in a semi-arid region. We selected the state of the art Weather Research and Forecasting-Community Land Model 4.0 (WRF-CLM4.0) model, the widely used WRF-Noah model and an empirical Complementary Relationship (CR) model to compare their model structures and mechanisms of estimating daily ET in the study region. The WRF model was chosen to address the problem of data scarcity in the study region and to derive model input for ET estimation with high spatial resolution. The seasonal and pooled performances of the three models were verified with in situ observations. Results indicate that the WRF-CLM4.0 model shows a better applicability in the study region, with a superior performance for the pooled datasets (Pearson correlation coefficient [r] = 0.89, root-mean-square error [RMSE] = 0.66 mm/d and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient [NSE] = 0.90), while the CR model has a comparable performance (r = 0.91, RMSE = 0.86 mm/d and NSE = 0.85) and the WRF-Noah model shows the worst performance (r = 0.82, RMSE = 0.94 mm/d and NSE = 0.81). The differences are mainly caused by different representations of the land surface characteristics and hydrology of the study region by the three different models. Our analysis shows that the WRF-CLM4.0 model and the CR model are more applicable to the APENC than the WRF-Noah model. For regional applications, the CR model, with fewer parameters and simpler structure, is able to capture the local characteristic and well-suited for data lacking, highly heterogeneous landscapes such as the APENC.
机译:准确估计蒸散过度区域规模对生态学研究,农业生产和水资源管理至关重要。然而,已经完成了很少的研究来估计缺乏的数据缺乏,高度异质的干旱地区,如中国西北部(APENC)的农业 - 牧区生态龙等数据。在这项研究中,我们将在半干旱地区进行了天气研究和预测(WRF)模型驱动的三种实际ET估计方法。我们选择了最先进的天气研究和预测社区陆地模型4.0(WRF-CLM4.0)模型,广泛使用的WRF-NOAH模型和经验互补关系(CR)模型,用于比较其模型结构和估算机制每日等在研究区域。选择WRF模型以解决研究区域的数据稀缺问题,并以高空间分辨率导出ET估计的模型输入。三种模型的季节性和汇总性能进行了原位观察。结果表明,WRF-CLM4.0模型在研究区域中显示了更好的适用性,具有卓越的汇集数据集的性能(Pearson相关系数[R] = 0.89,根均方误差[Rmse] = 0.66 mm / D和NASH-SUTCLIFFE效率系数[NSE] = 0.90),而CR模型具有可比性(R = 0.91,RMSE = 0.86mm / d和NSE = 0.85),并且WRF-NOAH模型显示最差的性能(R = 0.82,RMSE = 0.94 mm / d和nse = 0.81)。差异主要是由三种不同模型的研究区域的土地表面特征和水文的不同表示引起的。我们的分析表明,WRF-CLM4.0模型和CR模型比WRF-NOAH模型更适用于APENC。对于区域应用程序,CR模型具有更少参数和更简单的结构,能够捕获本地特征和适合缺乏的数据,高度异构的景观,例如APENC。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Science of the Total Environment》 |2020年第10期|138635.1-138635.12|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Key Laboratory of West China's Environmental System (Ministry of Education) College of Earth and Environmental Sciences Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu 730000 China;

    Key Laboratory of West China's Environmental System (Ministry of Education) College of Earth and Environmental Sciences Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu 730000 China;

    Key Laboratory of West China's Environmental System (Ministry of Education) College of Earth and Environmental Sciences Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu 730000 China;

    Key Laboratory of West China's Environmental System (Ministry of Education) College of Earth and Environmental Sciences Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu 730000 China Department of Geography Western Michigan University Kalamazoo MI 49008 USA;

    Key Laboratory of West China's Environmental System (Ministry of Education) College of Earth and Environmental Sciences Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu 730000 China;

    Key Laboratory of West China's Environmental System (Ministry of Education) College of Earth and Environmental Sciences Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu 730000 China;

    Key Laboratory of West China's Environmental System (Ministry of Education) College of Earth and Environmental Sciences Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu 730000 China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Daily regional ET; Complementary relationship; Community land model; Noah model; Weather research and forecasting; Agricultural-pastoral ecotone in Northwest China;

    机译:每日地区et;互补关系;社区土地模型;诺亚模特;天气研究和预测;中国西北部的农业田间杂货;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号